Suppr超能文献

SUMMIT 试验:丁丙诺啡与美沙酮维持治疗的现场比较。

The SUMMIT trial: a field comparison of buprenorphine versus methadone maintenance treatment.

机构信息

Norfolk & Waveney Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (NWMHFT), UK.

出版信息

J Subst Abuse Treat. 2010 Dec;39(4):340-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2010.07.009.

Abstract

This prospective patient-preference study examined the effectiveness in practice of methadone versus buprenorphine maintenance treatment and the beliefs of subjects regarding these drugs. A total of 361 opiate-dependent individuals (89% of those eligible, presenting for treatment over 2 years at a drug service in England) received rapid titration then flexible dosing with methadone or buprenorphine; 227 patients chose methadone (63%) and 134 buprenorphine (37%). Participants choosing methadone had more severe substance abuse and psychiatric and physical problems but were more likely to remain in treatment. Survival analysis indicated those prescribed methadone were over twice as likely to be retained (hazard ratio for retention was 2.08 and 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.49-2.94 for methadone vs. buprenorphine), However, those retained on buprenorphine were more likely to suppress illicit opiate use (odds ratio = 2.136, 95% CI = 1.509-3.027, p < .001) and achieve detoxification. Buprenorphine may also recruit more individuals to treatment because 28% of those choosing buprenorphine (10% of the total sample) stated they would not have accessed treatment with methadone.

摘要

这项前瞻性的患者偏好研究考察了美沙酮与丁丙诺啡维持治疗在实践中的有效性,以及受试者对这些药物的看法。共有 361 名阿片类药物依赖者(符合条件者的 89%,在英格兰的一个药物服务机构接受治疗超过 2 年)接受了快速滴定,然后接受美沙酮或丁丙诺啡的灵活剂量治疗;227 名患者选择了美沙酮(63%),134 名选择了丁丙诺啡(37%)。选择美沙酮的参与者有更严重的物质滥用、精神和身体问题,但更有可能继续接受治疗。生存分析表明,开美沙酮的患者保留率高出两倍多(保留的风险比为 2.08,95%置信区间[CI]为 1.49-2.94,美沙酮与丁丙诺啡相比),然而,保留在丁丙诺啡上的患者更有可能抑制非法阿片类药物的使用(比值比=2.136,95%CI=1.509-3.027,p<0.001)并实现戒毒。丁丙诺啡也可能招募更多的人接受治疗,因为选择丁丙诺啡的人中,有 28%(占总样本的 10%)表示他们不会接受美沙酮治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验