• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

终末期左心室辅助装置受者的临终决策制定与实施。

End-of-life decision making and implementation in recipients of a destination left ventricular assist device.

机构信息

Utah Artificial Heart Program, and Intermountain Medical Center and Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, Utah 84107, USA.

出版信息

J Heart Lung Transplant. 2010 Dec;29(12):1337-41. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2010.07.001.

DOI:10.1016/j.healun.2010.07.001
PMID:20817564
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) as destination therapy (DT) is increasing and has proven beneficial in prolonging survival and improving quality of life in select patients with end-stage heart failure. Nonetheless, end-of-life (EOL) issues are inevitable and how to approach them underreported.

METHODS

Our DT data registry was queried for eligible patients, defined as those individuals who actively participated in EOL decision making. The process from early EOL discussion to palliation and death was reviewed. We recorded the causes leading to EOL discussion, time from EOL decision to withdrawal and from withdrawal to death, and location. Primary caregivers were surveyed to qualify their experience and identify themes relevant to this process.

RESULTS

Between 1999 and 2009, 92 DT LVADs were implanted in 69 patients. Twenty patients qualified for inclusion (mean length of support: 833 days). A decrease in quality of life from new/worsening comorbidities usually prompted EOL discussion. Eleven patients died at home, 8 in the hospital and 1 in a nursing home. Time from EOL decision to LVAD withdrawal ranged from <1 day to 2 weeks and from withdrawal until death was <20 minutes in all cases. Palliative care was provided to all patients. Ongoing assistance from the healthcare team facilitated closure and ensured comfort at EOL.

CONCLUSIONS

With expanding indications and improved technology, more DT LVADs will be implanted and for longer durations, and more patients will face EOL issues. A multidisciplinary team approach with protocols involving DT patients and their families in EOL decision making allows for continuity of care and ensures dignity and comfort at EOL.

摘要

背景

左心室辅助装置(LVAD)作为终末期心力衰竭患者的终末期治疗(destination therapy,DT)的应用正在增加,并已被证明在延长生存时间和提高生活质量方面具有益处。然而,终末期(end-of-life,EOL)问题不可避免,如何处理这些问题的报道很少。

方法

我们对 DT 数据登记处进行了查询,以确定符合条件的患者,这些患者被定义为积极参与 EOL 决策的患者。审查了从早期 EOL 讨论到姑息治疗和死亡的过程。我们记录了导致 EOL 讨论的原因、从 EOL 决定到撤机以及从撤机到死亡的时间以及地点。对主要护理人员进行了调查,以确定他们的经验并确定与该过程相关的主题。

结果

1999 年至 2009 年,在 69 名患者中植入了 92 台 DT LVAD。20 名患者符合纳入标准(平均支持时间:833 天)。生活质量下降是由于新的/恶化的合并症,通常会引发 EOL 讨论。11 名患者在家中死亡,8 名在医院,1 名在养老院。从 EOL 决定到 LVAD 撤机的时间从<1 天到 2 周不等,从撤机到死亡的时间在所有情况下均<20 分钟。所有患者均接受姑息治疗。医疗团队的持续帮助促进了患者的安宁,并确保了 EOL 期间的舒适。

结论

随着适应证的扩大和技术的进步,将植入更多的 DT LVAD,并持续更长时间,更多的患者将面临 EOL 问题。采用多学科团队方法,制定涉及 DT 患者及其家属的 EOL 决策的方案,可实现医疗护理的连续性,并确保 EOL 期间的尊严和舒适。

相似文献

1
End-of-life decision making and implementation in recipients of a destination left ventricular assist device.终末期左心室辅助装置受者的临终决策制定与实施。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2010 Dec;29(12):1337-41. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2010.07.001.
2
Improving outcomes with long-term "destination" therapy using left ventricular assist devices.使用左心室辅助装置进行长期“目标”治疗以改善治疗效果。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008 Jun;135(6):1353-60; discussion 1360-1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.09.124.
3
Left ventricular assist devices as destination therapy: a new look at survival.作为终末期治疗的左心室辅助装置:对生存率的新审视。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Jan;129(1):9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.04.044.
4
Self-care and communication issues at the end of life of recipients of a left-ventricular assist device as destination therapy.左心室辅助装置作为终末期心力衰竭的靶心治疗受体的自我护理和沟通问题。
Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2013 Mar;7(1):29-35. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0b013e32835d2d50.
5
Outcomes of left ventricular assist device implantation as destination therapy in the post-REMATCH era: implications for patient selection.左心室辅助装置植入作为终末期治疗在 REMATCH 时代后的结局:对患者选择的启示。
Circulation. 2007 Jul 31;116(5):497-505. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.691972. Epub 2007 Jul 16.
6
Longitudinal change in quality of life and impact on survival after left ventricular assist device implantation.左心室辅助装置植入术后生活质量的纵向变化及其对生存的影响。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Apr;77(4):1321-7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.09.089.
7
Caregiving for patients requiring left ventricular assistance device support.左心室辅助装置支持患者的护理。
Heart Lung. 2010 May-Jun;39(3):196-200. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2009.07.007. Epub 2009 Oct 1.
8
Post-cardiac transplant survival after support with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: impact of duration of left ventricular assist device support and other variables.心脏移植后使用持续血流左心室辅助装置的生存情况:左心室辅助装置支持时间和其他变量的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Jul;140(1):174-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.03.037. Epub 2010 May 5.
9
Long-term use of a left ventricular assist device for end-stage heart failure.终末期心力衰竭患者长期使用左心室辅助装置。
N Engl J Med. 2001 Nov 15;345(20):1435-43. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012175.
10
Left ventricular assist device destination therapy versus extended criteria cardiac transplant.左心室辅助装置作为终末期心衰治疗与标准外供心心脏移植的比较
Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Apr;89(4):1205-9; discussion 1210. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.12.058.

引用本文的文献

1
Interprofessional Clinician Perspectives on LVAD Deactivation Compared to Dialysis Discontinuation: A Cross-Sectional Study Using Vignettes.与停止透析相比,跨专业临床医生对左心室辅助装置停用的看法:一项使用病例的横断面研究
JACC Adv. 2025 Jun;4(6 Pt 1):101835. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101835. Epub 2025 May 30.
2
Heart Failure in Older Patients: An Update.老年患者心力衰竭:最新进展
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 14;14(6):1982. doi: 10.3390/jcm14061982.
3
Perceptions of Bereaved Caregivers and Clinicians About End-of-Life Care for Patients With Destination Therapy Left Ventricular Assist Devices.
临终关怀患者及其临床医生对采用终末期心衰治疗的患者接受左心室辅助装置治疗的看法。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Aug 3;10(15):e020949. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.020949. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
4
"Talking Around It": A Qualitative Study Exploring Dyadic Congruence in Managing the Uncertainty of Living With a Ventricular Assist Device.“绕着它说”:一项定性研究,探索管理心室辅助设备生活的不确定性中的对偶一致性。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2021;36(3):229-237. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000784.
5
The Importance of Palliative Counseling.姑息治疗咨询的重要性。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2020 Apr 10;117(15):268. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2020.0268a.
6
Matters to address prior to introducing new life support technology in Japan: three serious ethical concerns related to the use of left ventricular assist devices as destination therapy and suggested policies to deal with them.在日本引入新的生命支持技术之前需要解决的问题:与将左心室辅助装置用作终末期治疗相关的三个严重伦理问题以及应对这些问题的建议政策。
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Feb 27;19(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0251-z.
7
Outcomes Associated With Left Ventricular Assist Devices Among Recipients With and Without End-stage Renal Disease.左心室辅助装置在终末期肾病患者和非终末期肾病患者中的应用结果。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Feb 1;178(2):204-209. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.4831.
8
Algorithms to guide ambulance clinicians in the management of emergencies in patients with implanted rotary left ventricular assist devices.指导救护车临床医生管理植入式旋转左心室辅助设备患者急救的算法。
Emerg Med J. 2017 Dec;34(12):842-850. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2016-206172. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
9
Ethical challenges and terminal deactivation of left ventricular assist device.伦理挑战与左心室辅助装置的终末停用
Ann Transl Med. 2017 Aug;5(16):331. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.04.39.
10
Ethical Analysis of Withdrawing Total Artificial Heart Support.撤掉全人工心脏支持的伦理分析
Mayo Clin Proc. 2017 May;92(5):719-725. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.01.021.