• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

特质是维度还是类别?特质术语理解的发展变化。

Traits as dimensions or categories? Developmental change in the understanding of trait terms.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, New York University, NY, USA.

出版信息

Dev Psychol. 2010 Sep;46(5):1078-88. doi: 10.1037/a0020207.

DOI:10.1037/a0020207
PMID:20822224
Abstract

Recent research has suggested that young children have relatively well-developed trait concepts. However, this literature overlooks potential age-related differences in children's appreciation of the fundamentally dimensional nature of traits. In Study 1, we presented 4-, 5-, and 7-year-old children and adults with sets of characters and asked them to indicate the preferences of a target character who shared appearance attributes with one character (appearance match) and shared a common trait with the other character (trait match). Traits were presented in a way that emphasized either their categorical or their dimensional nature. When the dimensional nature of trait terms was emphasized, the youngest children made fewer trait-based inferences, and the use of traits increased with age. In Study 2, we gave 4-year-old children and adults the same task except that the extent to which appearance cues could serve as a meaningful basis of judgment was varied. Results were consistent with the findings of Study 1, although children were more likely to rely on dimensional presentations of traits in the absence of strong appearance cues. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

最近的研究表明,幼儿已经具有相对发达的特质概念。然而,这一文献忽略了儿童对特质基本维度性质的理解可能存在与年龄相关的差异。在研究 1 中,我们向 4 岁、5 岁和 7 岁的儿童和成年人展示了一系列角色,并要求他们指出一个与一个角色(外貌匹配)具有相同外貌属性的目标角色的偏好,以及与另一个角色(特质匹配)具有相同特质的目标角色的偏好。特质以强调其类别或维度性质的方式呈现。当强调特质术语的维度性质时,最小的孩子做出的特质推理较少,并且随着年龄的增长,使用特质的频率增加。在研究 2 中,我们向 4 岁的儿童和成年人提供了相同的任务,只是判断的外貌线索可以作为有意义的依据的程度有所不同。研究结果与研究 1 的发现一致,尽管在没有强烈的外貌线索的情况下,儿童更有可能依赖于特质的维度呈现。(心理学文摘数据库记录(c)2010 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Traits as dimensions or categories? Developmental change in the understanding of trait terms.特质是维度还是类别?特质术语理解的发展变化。
Dev Psychol. 2010 Sep;46(5):1078-88. doi: 10.1037/a0020207.
2
Developmental changes in children's understanding of the similarity between photographs and their referents.儿童对照片与其所指对象之间相似性理解的发展变化。
Dev Sci. 2008 Jan;11(1):156-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00660.x.
3
Components of young children's trait understanding: behavior-to-trait inferences and trait-to-behavior predictions.幼儿特质理解的组成部分:从行为到特质的推断以及从特质到行为的预测。
Child Dev. 2007 Sep-Oct;78(5):1543-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01082.x.
4
Contribution of the priming paradigm to the understanding of the conceptual developmental shift from 5 to 9 years of age.启动范式对理解5至9岁儿童概念发展转变的贡献。
Dev Sci. 2009 Nov;12(6):956-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00847.x.
5
Children reason about shared preferences.儿童会推理共同偏好。
Dev Psychol. 2010 Mar;46(2):299-309. doi: 10.1037/a0018539.
6
What visual information do children and adults consider while switching between tasks? Eye-tracking investigation of cognitive flexibility development.儿童和成人在任务切换时会考虑哪些视觉信息?认知灵活性发展的眼动追踪研究。
Dev Psychol. 2010 Jul;46(4):955-72. doi: 10.1037/a0019674.
7
[Difficulty of young children of understanding emotion dissimulation].[幼儿理解情绪伪装的困难]
Can J Exp Psychol. 2009 Dec;63(4):276-86. doi: 10.1037/a0015689.
8
How fantasy benefits young children's understanding of pretense.幻想如何有益于幼儿对假装的理解。
Dev Sci. 2006 Jan;9(1):63-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2005.00464.x.
9
Monkey business: children's use of character identity to infer shared properties.恶作剧:儿童利用角色身份推断共享属性。
Cognition. 2009 Nov;113(2):167-76. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.07.012. Epub 2009 Aug 28.
10
Developmental differences in the use of recognition memory rejection mechanisms.识别记忆拒绝机制使用的发展差异。
Dev Psychol. 2010 May;46(3):691-8. doi: 10.1037/a0019148.

引用本文的文献

1
Racial Stereotype Application in 4-to-8-Year-Old White American Children: Emergence and Specificity.美国4至8岁白人儿童中的种族刻板印象应用:出现与特异性
J Cogn Dev. 2022;23(5):660-685. doi: 10.1080/15248372.2022.2090945. Epub 2022 Jul 18.