Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, 231Psychology Building, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Psychol Assess. 2010 Sep;22(3):559-68. doi: 10.1037/a0019617.
This study evaluates the validity of derived measures of the psychopathic personality traits of Fearless Dominance and Impulsive Antisociality from the NEO Personality Inventory-Revised (NEO-PI-R; Costa & McCrae, 1992) using data from the Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study (baseline N = 733). These 3 issues were examined: (a) the stability of the measures over a 10-year interval, (b) their criterion-related validity, and (c) their incremental validity relative to an alternative NEO-PI-R profile-rating approach for assessing psychopathy. NEO-PI-R Fearless Dominance and Impulsive Antisociality scales were relatively stable across 10 years and demonstrated differential associations with measures of personality pathology and psychopathology generally consistent with past research and theoretical considerations. Moreover, these measures demonstrated an appreciable degree of incremental validity over the NEO-PI-R profile-rating approach.
本研究使用协作纵向人格障碍研究(基线 N = 733)的数据,评估了源自 NEO 人格量表修订版(NEO-PI-R;Costa & McCrae,1992)的无畏支配和冲动反社会性等精神病态人格特质的派生测量的有效性。这 3 个问题包括:(a)这些测量在 10 年的间隔内的稳定性,(b)它们与标准相关的有效性,以及(c)与评估精神病态的替代 NEO-PI-R 特征评分方法相比,它们的增量有效性。NEO-PI-R 的无畏支配和冲动反社会性量表在 10 年内相对稳定,并表现出与人格病理学和精神病理学测量的差异关联,这与过去的研究和理论考虑基本一致。此外,这些测量方法相对于 NEO-PI-R 特征评分方法具有相当程度的增量有效性。