Witt Edward A, Donnellan M Brent, Blonigen Daniel M, Krueger Robert F, Conger Rand D
Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48823, USA.
J Pers Assess. 2009 May;91(3):265-76. doi: 10.1080/00223890902794317.
This report provides evidence for the reliability, validity, and developmental course of the psychopathic personality traits (factors) of Fearless Dominance (FD) and Impulsive Antisociality (IA) as assessed by items from the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire (MPQ; Patrick, Curtin, & Tellegen, 2002). In Study 1, MPQ-based measures of FD and IA were strongly correlated with their corresponding composite scores from the Psychopathic Personality Inventory-Revised (Lilienfeld & Widows, 2005). In Study 2, FD and IA had relatively distinct associations with measures of normal and maladaptive personality traits. In Study 3, FD and IA had substantial retest coefficients during the transition to adulthood, and both traits showed average declines with an especially substantial drop in IA. In Study 4, FD and IA were correlated with measures of internalizing and externalizing problems in ways consistent with previous research and theory. Collectively, these results provide important information about the assessment of FD and IA.
本报告提供了证据,证明通过多维人格问卷(MPQ;Patrick、Curtin和Tellegen,2002年)中的项目评估的无畏支配(FD)和冲动反社会性(IA)这两种精神病态人格特质(因素)的可靠性、有效性和发展过程。在研究1中,基于MPQ的FD和IA测量与《精神病态人格问卷修订版》(Lilienfeld和Widows,2005年)中相应的综合得分高度相关。在研究2中,FD和IA与正常和适应不良人格特质的测量有相对不同的关联。在研究3中,FD和IA在向成年期过渡期间有相当大的重测系数,并且两种特质都显示出平均下降,其中IA下降尤为显著。在研究4中,FD和IA与内化和外化问题的测量相关,其方式与先前的研究和理论一致。总体而言,这些结果提供了关于FD和IA评估的重要信息。