The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine, USA.
Physiol Genomics. 2011 Jan 7;43(1):1-11. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00108.2010. Epub 2010 Sep 7.
Lung function detection in mice is currently most accurately measured by invasive techniques, which are costly, labor intensive, and terminal. This limits their use for large-scale or longitudinal studies. Noninvasive assays are often used instead, but their accuracy for measuring lung function parameters such as resistance and elastance has been questioned in studies involving small numbers of mouse strains. Here we compared parameters detected by two different methods using 29 inbred mouse strains: enhanced pause (Penh), detected by unrestrained plethysmography, and central airway resistance and lung elastance, detected by a forced oscillation technique. We further tested whether the phenotypic variations were determined by the same genomic location in genome-wide association studies using a linear mixed model algorithm. Penh, resistance, and elastance were measured in nonexposed mice or mice exposed to saline and increasing doses of aerosolized methacholine. Because Penh differed from airway resistance in several strains and because the peak genetic associations found for Penh, resistance, or elastance were located at different genomic regions, we conclude that using Penh as an indicator for lung function changes in high-throughput genetic studies (i.e., genome-wide association studies or quantitative trait locus studies) measures something fundamentally different than airway resistance and lung elastance.
目前,对小鼠的肺功能检测最准确的方法是通过侵入性技术进行测量,但这些技术成本高、劳动强度大且是终末性的。这限制了它们在大规模或纵向研究中的应用。而非侵入性检测通常被替代,但在涉及少数小鼠品系的研究中,其测量阻力和弹性等肺功能参数的准确性受到质疑。在这里,我们使用 29 种近交系小鼠比较了两种不同方法检测到的参数:通过非束缚式体积描记法检测到的增强呼气暂停(Penh),以及通过强迫震荡技术检测到的中央气道阻力和肺弹性。我们进一步测试了使用线性混合模型算法的全基因组关联研究中,是否由相同的基因组位置决定了表型变异。在未暴露的小鼠或暴露于生理盐水和递增剂量的雾化乙酰甲胆碱的小鼠中测量 Penh、阻力和弹性。由于 Penh 在几种品系中与气道阻力不同,并且在 Penh、阻力或弹性的峰值遗传关联所在的基因组区域不同,我们得出结论,在高通量遗传研究(即全基因组关联研究或数量性状位点研究)中,使用 Penh 作为肺功能变化的指标,测量的结果与气道阻力和肺弹性完全不同。