Schrattenholz André, Groebe Karlfried, Soskic Vukic
ProteoSys AG, Mainz, Germany.
Methods Mol Biol. 2010;662:29-58. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-800-3_2.
Systems biology is essentially a proteomic and epigenetic exercise because the relatively condensed information of genomes unfolds on the level of proteins. The flexibility of cellular architectures is not only mediated by a dazzling number of proteinaceous species but moreover by the kinetics of their molecular changes: The time scales of posttranslational modifications range from milliseconds to years. The genetic framework of an organism only provides the blue print of protein embodiments which are constantly shaped by external input. Indeed, posttranslational modifications of proteins represent the scope and velocity of these inputs and fulfil the requirements of integration of external spatiotemporal signal transduction inside an organism. The optimization of biochemical networks for this type of information processing and storage results in chemically extremely fine tuned molecular entities. The huge dynamic range of concentrations, the chemical diversity and the necessity of synchronisation of complex protein expression patterns pose the major challenge of systemic analysis of biological models. One further message is that many of the key reactions in living systems are essentially based on interactions of moderate affinities and moderate selectivities. This principle is responsible for the enormous flexibility and redundancy of cellular circuitries. In complex disorders such as cancer or neurodegenerative diseases, which initially appear to be rooted in relatively subtle dysfunctions of multimodal physiologic pathways, drug discovery programs based on the concept of high affinity/high specificity compounds ("one-target, one-disease"), which has been dominating the pharmaceutical industry for a long time, increasingly turn out to be unsuccessful. Despite improvements in rational drug design and high throughput screening methods, the number of novel, single-target drugs fell much behind expectations during the past decade, and the treatment of "complex diseases" remains a most pressing medical need. Currently, a change of paradigm can be observed with regard to a new interest in agents that modulate multiple targets simultaneously, essentially "dirty drugs." Targeting cellular function as a system rather than on the level of the single target, significantly increases the size of the drugable proteome and is expected to introduce novel classes of multi-target drugs with fewer adverse effects and toxicity. Multiple target approaches have recently been used to design medications against atherosclerosis, cancer, depression, psychosis and neurodegenerative diseases. A focussed approach towards "systemic" drugs will certainly require the development of novel computational and mathematical concepts for appropriate modelling of complex data. But the key is the extraction of relevant molecular information from biological systems by implementing rigid statistical procedures to differential proteomic analytics.
系统生物学本质上是一项蛋白质组学和表观遗传学的实践活动,因为基因组相对精简的信息会在蛋白质水平上展开。细胞结构的灵活性不仅由数量众多、令人眼花缭乱的蛋白质种类介导,还由其分子变化的动力学介导:翻译后修饰的时间尺度从毫秒到数年不等。生物体的遗传框架仅提供蛋白质表现形式的蓝图,而这些表现形式会不断受到外部输入的塑造。实际上,蛋白质的翻译后修饰体现了这些输入的范围和速度,并满足了生物体内部外部时空信号转导整合的要求。针对这类信息处理和存储对生化网络进行优化,会产生化学上高度精细调节的分子实体。浓度的巨大动态范围、化学多样性以及复杂蛋白质表达模式同步的必要性,构成了生物模型系统分析的主要挑战。另一个要点是,生命系统中的许多关键反应本质上基于中等亲和力和中等选择性的相互作用。这一原则造就了细胞回路的巨大灵活性和冗余性。在诸如癌症或神经退行性疾病等复杂疾病中,这些疾病最初似乎源于多模式生理途径相对细微的功能障碍,基于高亲和力/高特异性化合物(“一个靶点一种疾病”)概念的药物研发项目,长期以来一直主导着制药行业,但如今越来越多地被证明是不成功的。尽管在合理药物设计和高通量筛选方法方面有所改进,但在过去十年中,新型单靶点药物的数量远远落后于预期,而“复杂疾病”的治疗仍然是最迫切的医疗需求。目前,可以观察到一种范式转变,即人们对同时调节多个靶点的药物产生了新的兴趣,这类药物本质上就是“脏药”。将细胞功能作为一个系统而非在单个靶点水平上进行靶向,显著增加了可成药蛋白质组的规模,并有望引入副作用和毒性更小的新型多靶点药物。最近,多靶点方法已被用于设计针对动脉粥样硬化、癌症、抑郁症、精神病和神经退行性疾病的药物。专注于“系统性”药物研发的方法肯定需要开发新的计算和数学概念,以便对复杂数据进行适当建模。但关键在于通过对差异蛋白质组分析实施严格的统计程序,从生物系统中提取相关分子信息。