Schrattenholz André, Soskić Vukić
ProteoSys AG, Carl-Zeiss-Strasse 51, 55129 Mainz, Germany.
Curr Med Chem. 2008;15(15):1520-8. doi: 10.2174/092986708784638843.
The complexity and flexibility of cellular architectures is increasingly recognized by impressive progress on the side of molecular analytics, i.e. proteomics, genomics and metabolomics. One of the messages from systems biology is that the number of molecular species in cellular networks is orders of magnitude bigger than anticipated by genomic analysis, in particular by fast posttranslational modifications of proteins. The requirements to manage external signals, integrate spatiotemporal signal transduction inside an organism and at the same time optimizing networks of biochemical and chemical reactions result in chemically extremely fine tuned molecular entities. Chemical side reactions of enzymatic activity, like e.g. random oxidative damage of proteins by free radicals during aging constantly introduce epigenetic alterations of protein targets. These events gradually and on an individual stochastic scale, keep modifying activities of these targets, and their affinities and selectivities towards biological and pharmacological ligands. One further message is that many of the key reactions in living systems are essentially based on interactions of low affinities and even low selectivities. This principle is responsible for the enormous flexibility and redundancy of cellular circuitries. So, in complex disorders like cancer or neurodegenerative diseases, which are rooted in relatively subtle and multimodal dysfunction of important physiologic pathways, drug discovery programs based on the concept of high affinity/high specificity compounds ("one-target, one-disease"), which still dominate the pharmaceutical industry increasingly turn out to be unsuccessful. Despite improvements in rational drug design and high throughput screening methods, the number of novel, single-target drugs fell much behind expectations during the past decade and the treatment of "complex diseases" remains a most pressing medical need. Currently a change of paradigm can be observed with regard to a new focus on agents that modulate multiple targets simultaneously. Targeting cellular function as a system rather than on the level of the single protein molecule significantly increases the size of the drugable proteome and is expected to introduce novel classes of multi-target drugs with fewer adverse effects and toxicity. Multiple target approaches have recently been used to design medications against atherosclerosis, cancer, depression, psychosis and neurodegenerative diseases. A focussed approach towards "systemic" drugs will certainly require the development of novel computational and mathematical concepts for appropriate modelling of complex data and extraction of "screenable" information from biological systems essentially ruled by deterministic chaotic processes on a background of individual stochasticity.
分子分析(即蛋白质组学、基因组学和代谢组学)取得的显著进展,使人们越来越认识到细胞结构的复杂性和灵活性。系统生物学传递的一个信息是,细胞网络中分子种类的数量比基因组分析预期的要大几个数量级,特别是蛋白质快速的翻译后修饰。管理外部信号、整合生物体内时空信号转导以及同时优化生化和化学反应网络的需求,导致了化学上极其精细调控的分子实体。酶活性的化学副反应,例如衰老过程中自由基对蛋白质的随机氧化损伤,不断引入蛋白质靶点的表观遗传改变。这些事件在个体随机尺度上逐渐持续地改变这些靶点的活性、它们对生物和药理配体的亲和力和选择性。另一个信息是,生命系统中的许多关键反应本质上是基于低亲和力甚至低选择性的相互作用。这一原理导致了细胞回路具有极大的灵活性和冗余性。因此,在诸如癌症或神经退行性疾病等复杂疾病中,这些疾病源于重要生理途径相对微妙和多模式的功能障碍,基于高亲和力/高特异性化合物(“一个靶点,一种疾病”)概念的药物发现计划,尽管在合理药物设计和高通量筛选方法方面有所改进,但在过去十年中,新型单靶点药物的数量远远落后于预期,而“复杂疾病”的治疗仍然是最紧迫的医疗需求。目前可以观察到一种范式转变,即新的重点转向同时调节多个靶点的药物。将细胞功能作为一个系统而非单个蛋白质分子水平进行靶向,显著增加了可药物化蛋白质组的规模,并有望引入具有更少副作用和毒性的新型多靶点药物。最近,多靶点方法已被用于设计针对动脉粥样硬化、癌症、抑郁症、精神病和神经退行性疾病的药物。针对“系统性”药物的重点方法肯定需要开发新的数据计算和数学概念,以便对复杂数据进行适当建模,并从基本上由个体随机性背景下的确定性混沌过程主导的生物系统中提取“可筛选”信息。