Katalinic Owen M, Harvey Lisa A, Herbert Robert D, Moseley Anne M, Lannin Natasha A, Schurr Karl
Rehabilitation Studies Unit, Northern Clinical School, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, PO Box 6, Ryde, NSW, Australia, 1680.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Sep 8(9):CD007455. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007455.pub2.
Contractures are a common complication of neurological and musculoskeletal conditions, and are characterised by a reduction in joint mobility. Stretch is widely used for the treatment and prevention of contractures. However, it is not clear whether stretch is effective.
To determine the effects of stretch on contractures in people with, or at risk of, contractures.
Electronic searches were conducted on CENTRAL, DARE, HTA (The Cochrane Library); MEDLINE; CINAHL; EMBASE; SCI-EXPANDED; and PEDro (April 2009).
Randomised controlled trials and controlled clinical trials of stretch applied for the purpose of treating or preventing contractures were included.
Two review authors independently selected trials, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. The primary outcomes of interest were joint mobility and quality of life. The secondary outcomes were pain, spasticity, activity limitation and participation restriction. Outcomes were evaluated immediately after intervention, in the short term (one to seven days) and in the long term (> one week). Effects were expressed as mean differences or standardised mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Meta-analyses were conducted with a random-effects model.
Thirty-five studies with 1391 participants met the inclusion criteria. No study performed stretch for more than seven months. In people with neurological conditions, there was moderate to high quality evidence to indicate that stretch does not have clinically important immediate (mean difference 3 degrees ; 95% CI 0 to 7), short-term (mean difference 1 degrees ; 95% CI 0 to 3) or long-term (mean difference 0 degrees ; 95% CI -2 to 2) effects on joint mobility. The results were similar for people with non-neurological conditions. For all conditions, there is little or no effect of stretch on pain, spasticity, activity limitation, participation restriction or quality of life.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Stretch does not have clinically important effects on joint mobility in people with, or at risk of, contractures if performed for less than seven months. The effects of stretch performed for periods longer than seven months have not been investigated.
挛缩是神经和肌肉骨骼疾病的常见并发症,其特征为关节活动度降低。伸展运动被广泛用于治疗和预防挛缩。然而,伸展运动是否有效尚不清楚。
确定伸展运动对患有挛缩或有挛缩风险的人群挛缩的影响。
在CENTRAL、DARE、HTA(考克兰图书馆)、MEDLINE、CINAHL、EMBASE、SCI-EXPANDED和PEDro(2009年4月)进行电子检索。
纳入为治疗或预防挛缩而进行伸展运动的随机对照试验和对照临床试验。
两位综述作者独立选择试验、提取数据并评估偏倚风险。主要关注的结局是关节活动度和生活质量。次要结局是疼痛、痉挛、活动受限和参与受限。在干预后立即、短期(1至7天)和长期(>1周)对结局进行评估。效应以平均差或标准化平均差及95%置信区间(CI)表示。采用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。
35项研究共1391名参与者符合纳入标准。没有研究进行伸展运动超过7个月。在患有神经疾病的人群中,有中等到高质量的证据表明,伸展运动对关节活动度没有临床上重要的即时(平均差3度;95%CI 0至7)、短期(平均差1度;95%CI 0至3)或长期(平均差0度;95%CI -2至2)影响。非神经疾病患者的结果相似。对于所有情况,伸展运动对疼痛、痉挛、活动受限、参与受限或生活质量几乎没有影响。
如果进行伸展运动的时间少于7个月,对患有挛缩或有挛缩风险的人群的关节活动度没有临床上重要影响。尚未研究进行超过7个月的伸展运动的效果。