Research Department, National Social Insurance Institution of Finland, Helsinki, Finland.
Value Health. 2010 Dec;13(8):998-1004. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2010.00779.x. Epub 2010 Sep 3.
The aim of this prospective randomized study was to evaluate the effect of waiting time (WT) on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), knee pain and physical function, and the use and costs of medication of patients awaiting total knee replacement.
When placed on the waiting list, 438 patients were randomized into a short waiting time (SWT ≤ 3 months) or a nonfixed waiting time (NFWT > 3 months) group. HRQoL was measured by the 15D, and pain and physical function by modified Knee Society Clinical Rating System at baseline, admission, and 3 and 12 months postoperatively. The costs of medication due to osteoarthritis were calculated at the same measurement points. All analyses were performed using the intention-to-treat principle.
The mean WT was 94 and 239 days in the SWT and NFWT groups, respectively. Apart from higher weekly cost of medication in the SWT group at admission and better HRQoL in the NFWT group 1 year postoperatively, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups in other outcomes during the follow-up.
Those in the SWT group had higher weekly costs of medication at admission, and reached better HRQoL 3 months earlier than those in the NFWT group, but the latter had better HRQoL after operation. Otherwise, the length of WT was not associated with different health and HRQoL outcomes in the groups.
本前瞻性随机研究旨在评估等待时间(WT)对健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)、膝关节疼痛和身体功能的影响,以及接受全膝关节置换术患者的药物使用和费用。
当患者被列入等候名单时,438 名患者被随机分为短等待时间(SWT≤3 个月)或非固定等待时间(NFWT>3 个月)组。HRQoL 通过 15D 进行测量,疼痛和身体功能通过改良膝关节学会临床评分系统在基线、入院时以及术后 3 个月和 12 个月进行测量。在相同的测量点计算因骨关节炎而产生的药物费用。所有分析均采用意向治疗原则进行。
SWT 和 NFWT 组的平均 WT 分别为 94 天和 239 天。除了 SWT 组在入院时每周药物费用较高和 NFWT 组术后 1 年 HRQoL 更好外,在随访期间,两组在其他结果方面无统计学差异。
SWT 组在入院时每周药物费用较高,比 NFWT 组早 3 个月达到更好的 HRQoL,但后者术后 HRQoL 更好。否则,WT 的长短与两组不同的健康和 HRQoL 结果无关。