Hirvonen Johanna, Blom Marja, Tuominen Ulla, Seitsalo Seppo, Lehto Matti, Paavolainen Pekka, Hietaniemi Kalevi, Rissanen Pekka, Sintonen Harri
National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health, Helsinki, Finland.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006 Jan 19;4:3. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-4-3.
Several quality-of-life studies in patients awaiting major joint replacement have focused on the outcomes of surgery. Interest in examining patients on the elective waiting list has increased since the beginning of 2000. We assessed health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients waiting for total hip (THR) or knee (TKR) replacement in three Finnish hospitals, and compared patients' HRQoL with that of population controls.
A total of 133 patients awaiting major joint replacement due to osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip or knee joint were prospectively followed from the time the patient was placed on the waiting list to hospital admission. A sample of controls matched by age, gender, housing and home municipality was drawn from the computerised population register. HRQoL was measured by the generic 15D instrument. Differences between patients and the population controls were tested by the independent samples t-test and between the measurement points by the paired samples t-test. A linear regression model was used to explain the variance in the 15D score at admission.
At baseline, 15D scores were significantly different between patients and the population controls. Compared with the population controls, patients were worse off on the dimensions of moving (P < 0.001), sleeping (P < 0.001), sexual activity (P < 0.001), vitality (P < 0.001), usual activities (P < 0.001) and discomfort and symptoms (P < 0.001). Further, psychological factors--depression (P < 0.001) and distress (P = 0.004)--were worse among patients than population controls. The patients showed statistically significantly improved average scores at admission on the dimensions of moving (P = 0.026), sleeping (P = 0.004) and discomfort and symptoms (P = 0.041), but not in the overall 15D score compared with the baseline. In patients, 15D score at baseline (P < 0.001) and body mass index (BMI) (P = 0.020) had an independent effect on patients' 15D score at hospital admission.
Although patients' HRQoL did not deteriorate while waiting, a consistently worse HRQoL was observed in patients waiting for major joint replacement compared with population controls.
多项针对等待大型关节置换手术患者的生活质量研究聚焦于手术结果。自2000年初以来,对择期等待名单上患者的研究兴趣有所增加。我们评估了芬兰三家医院中等待全髋关节置换(THR)或全膝关节置换(TKR)患者的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL),并将患者的HRQoL与人群对照组进行了比较。
共有133例因髋或膝关节骨关节炎(OA)等待大型关节置换的患者,从其被列入等待名单至入院期间进行前瞻性随访。通过计算机化人口登记册抽取了年龄、性别、住房和家乡市镇相匹配的对照组样本。HRQoL采用通用的15D工具进行测量。患者与人群对照组之间的差异采用独立样本t检验,测量点之间的差异采用配对样本t检验。使用线性回归模型解释入院时15D评分的方差。
在基线时,患者与人群对照组的15D评分存在显著差异。与人群对照组相比,患者在活动(P < 0.001)、睡眠(P < 0.001)、性活动(P < 0.001)、活力(P < 0.001)、日常活动(P < 0.001)以及不适和症状(P < 0.001)等维度上的情况更差。此外,患者的心理因素——抑郁(P < 0.001)和痛苦(P = 0.004)——也比人群对照组更严重。与基线相比,患者在入院时活动(P = 0.026)、睡眠(P = 0.004)和不适与症状(P = 0.041)维度上的平均评分有统计学显著改善,但总体15D评分未改善。在患者中,基线时的15D评分(P < 0.001)和体重指数(BMI)(P = 0.020)对患者入院时的15D评分有独立影响。
尽管患者在等待期间HRQoL没有恶化,但与人群对照组相比,等待大型关节置换的患者HRQoL一直较差。