Department of Emergency Medicine, Hazrat Rasool-e-Akram Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Tehran, Iran.
Am J Emerg Med. 2010 Oct;28(8):933-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2009.06.002. Epub 2010 Mar 25.
Blunt abdominal trauma is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among all age groups. A multiplicity of diagnostic modalities exists to evaluate the abdomen. We sought to assess the diagnostic performance of base deficit (BD) in identifying intra-abdominal injury in patients with blunt abdominal trauma.
A prospective, nonrandomized series of patients with blunt abdominal trauma admitted into the 2 emergency departments was investigated from September 2007 to September 2008. Arterial blood samples were analyzed. According to BD, the patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1 who had a BD of -6 or lower and group 2 who had a BD more than -6. Ultrasonography, computed tomographic scan, or laparotomy was performed to find intra-abdominal injury. Follow-up at 7 days by telephone interview was obtained on patients who were discharged.
A total of 400 patients were enrolled, with a mean (SD) age of 34.8 ± 17.1 years. Two hundred sixty-eight (67%) of them were male. Seventy-six (19%) of patients had a BD of -6 or lower. Sixty-eight (17%) of them showed to have intra-abdominal injury with a BD of approximately -8.7 ± 3.2, compared with patients without intra-abdominal injury, -0.4 ± 0.1. Patients with a BD of -6 or lower achieved more laparotomy and blood transfusion compared with patients with a BD more than -6. On receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the cutoff point of -6 was obtained with sensitivity and specificity of 88.2% and 95.2% and with positive and negative predictive values of 79% and 97.5%, respectively. None of outpatients had abdominal problem in telephone follow-up.
These data show that the BD is an early available important indicator to identify intra-abdominal injury in patients with blunt abdominal trauma, as well as a high transfusion requirement.
钝性腹部创伤是各年龄段人群发病率和死亡率的主要原因。存在多种诊断方法来评估腹部。我们旨在评估基础缺陷(BD)在识别钝性腹部创伤患者的腹部损伤中的诊断性能。
对 2007 年 9 月至 2008 年 9 月期间收入 2 个急诊部的钝性腹部创伤患者进行了前瞻性、非随机系列研究。分析了动脉血样本。根据 BD,将患者分为 2 组:BD 为-6 或更低的组 1 和 BD 大于-6 的组 2。进行超声检查、计算机断层扫描或剖腹术以发现腹部损伤。对出院患者进行了 7 天的电话随访。
共纳入 400 例患者,平均(SD)年龄为 34.8±17.1 岁。其中 268 例(67%)为男性。76 例(19%)患者的 BD 为-6 或更低。其中 68 例(17%)的患者有腹部损伤,BD 约为-8.7±3.2,而无腹部损伤的患者 BD 为-0.4±0.1。BD 为-6 或更低的患者与 BD 大于-6 的患者相比,接受了更多的剖腹术和输血。在受试者工作特征曲线分析中,获得了 -6 的截断点,其灵敏度和特异性分别为 88.2%和 95.2%,阳性和阴性预测值分别为 79%和 97.5%。电话随访中无门诊患者有腹部问题。
这些数据表明,BD 是识别钝性腹部创伤患者腹部损伤的一个早期重要指标,也是输血需求高的指标。