Suppr超能文献

在寻求治疗的焦虑和抑郁患者样本中,确定无法容忍不确定性的结构。

Achieving certainty about the structure of intolerance of uncertainty in a treatment-seeking sample with anxiety and depression.

机构信息

Centre for Clinical Interventions, Perth, Australia.

出版信息

J Anxiety Disord. 2011 Jan;25(1):112-22. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.08.010. Epub 2010 Aug 19.

Abstract

Evidence is accumulating that intolerance of uncertainty (IU) may be a transdiagnostic maintaining factor across the anxiety disorders and depression. However, psychometric studies of the most commonly used measure of IU have typically used undergraduate students, and the factor structure has been highly inconsistent. Previous studies have also tended to focus on one diagnostic subgroup or related symptom, thereby limiting transdiagnostic comparisons. The first aim of this study was to test the latent structure of a commonly used measure of IU in a treatment-seeking sample with anxiety and depression (n=463). The second aim was to examine psychometric properties of the best fitting solution, including internal reliability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to compare the goodness of fit of five models previously found with undergraduate and community samples. A two-factor solution, comprising of prospective anxiety and inhibitory anxiety, was the best fitting model. The total scale and subscales demonstrated excellent internal reliability. Convergent validity was demonstrated by the scales correlating with symptoms associated with five anxiety disorders and depression, as well as neuroticism, distress and disability. IU explained unique variance in all symptom measures, even after controlling for neuroticism and other symptom measures. Evidence of discriminant validity was also found for each IU subscale. Findings support reliability and validity of the two-factor solution, and are consistent with IU being a transdiagnostic maintaining factor.

摘要

越来越多的证据表明,不确定性容忍度(IU)可能是焦虑障碍和抑郁症共有的一种跨诊断维持因素。然而,IU 最常用测量方法的心理计量学研究通常使用本科生,且其因素结构高度不一致。先前的研究也倾向于关注一个诊断亚组或相关症状,从而限制了跨诊断比较。本研究的第一个目的是在患有焦虑和抑郁的治疗寻求者样本(n=463)中检验 IU 常用测量方法的潜在结构。第二个目的是检验最佳拟合解决方案的心理计量学特性,包括内部可靠性、聚合效度和判别效度。验证性因子分析用于比较在本科生和社区样本中发现的五个模型的拟合优度。由前瞻性焦虑和抑制性焦虑组成的两因素模型是最佳拟合模型。总量表和分量表具有极好的内部可靠性。量表与与五种焦虑障碍和抑郁症以及神经质、痛苦和残疾相关的症状相关,表明了聚合效度。即使在控制神经质和其他症状测量后,IU 也可以解释所有症状测量的独特方差。每个 IU 分量表都有判别效度的证据。研究结果支持两因素解决方案的可靠性和有效性,并且与 IU 是一种跨诊断维持因素的观点一致。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验