Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77230-1439, USA.
Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Nov 1;16(21):5351-61. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1265. Epub 2010 Sep 9.
We examined in a prospective, randomized, international clinical trial the performance of a previously defined 30-gene predictor (DLDA-30) of pathologic complete response (pCR) to preoperative weekly paclitaxel and fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (T/FAC) chemotherapy, and assessed if DLDA-30 also predicts increased sensitivity to FAC-only chemotherapy. We compared the pCR rates after T/FAC versus FACx6 preoperative chemotherapy. We also did an exploratory analysis to identify novel candidate genes that differentially predict response in the two treatment arms.
Two hundred and seventy-three patients were randomly assigned to receive either weekly paclitaxel × 12 followed by FAC × 4 (T/FAC, n = 138), or FAC × 6 (n = 135) neoadjuvant chemotherapy. All patients underwent a pretreatment fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the tumor for gene expression profiling and treatment response prediction.
The pCR rates were 19% and 9% in the T/FAC and FAC arms, respectively (P < 0.05). In the T/FAC arm, the positive predictive value (PPV) of the genomic predictor was 38% [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 21-56%], the negative predictive value was 88% (95% CI, 77-95%), and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.711. In the FAC arm, the PPV was 9% (95% CI, 1-29%) and the AUC was 0.584. This suggests that the genomic predictor may have regimen specificity. Its performance was similar to a clinical variable-based predictor nomogram.
Gene expression profiling for prospective response prediction was feasible in this international trial. The 30-gene predictor can identify patients with greater than average sensitivity to T/FAC chemotherapy. However, it captured molecular equivalents of clinical phenotype. Next-generation predictive markers will need to be developed separately for different molecular subsets of breast cancers.
我们在一项前瞻性、随机、国际临床试验中检验了先前定义的 30 个基因预测器(DLDA-30)对术前每周紫杉醇和氟尿嘧啶、多柔比星和环磷酰胺(T/FAC)化疗的病理完全缓解(pCR)的表现,并评估了 DLDA-30 是否也预测了对 FAC 单药化疗的敏感性增加。我们比较了 T/FAC 与 FACx6 术前化疗后的 pCR 率。我们还进行了一项探索性分析,以确定在两种治疗臂中差异预测反应的新候选基因。
273 名患者被随机分配接受每周紫杉醇×12 次联合 FAC×4 次(T/FAC,n=138)或 FAC×6 次(n=135)新辅助化疗。所有患者均接受肿瘤的术前细针抽吸活检,进行基因表达谱分析和治疗反应预测。
T/FAC 和 FAC 臂的 pCR 率分别为 19%和 9%(P<0.05)。在 T/FAC 臂中,基因组预测器的阳性预测值(PPV)为 38%[95%置信区间(95%CI),21-56%],阴性预测值为 88%(95%CI,77-95%),接受者操作特征曲线(ROC)下面积(AUC)为 0.711。在 FAC 臂中,PPV 为 9%(95%CI,1-29%),AUC 为 0.584。这表明基因组预测器可能具有方案特异性。其性能与基于临床变量的预测列线图相似。
在这项国际试验中,前瞻性反应预测的基因表达谱分析是可行的。30 个基因预测器可以识别对 T/FAC 化疗敏感性高于平均水平的患者。然而,它捕捉到了临床表型的分子等价物。需要为不同的乳腺癌分子亚群单独开发下一代预测标记物。