Suppr超能文献

一步法自酸蚀粘结剂中预酸蚀的作用

Role of preliminary etching for one-step self-etch adhesives.

作者信息

Taschner Michael, Nato Fernando, Mazzoni Annalisa, Frankenberger Roland, Krämer Norbert, Di Lenarda Roberto, Petschelt Anselm, Breschi Lorenzo

机构信息

Dental Clinic 1 - Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Oral Sci. 2010 Oct;118(5):517-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2010.00769.x.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyse the effect of preliminary phosphoric acid etching of enamel and dentine before the application of two, one-step self-etch adhesive systems. The systems were applied onto acid-etched or smear-layer-covered enamel and dentine. The treatment groups were as follows: group 1, Adper Easy Bond (3M ESPE) on etched substrate; group 2, Adper Easy Bond (control); group 3, iBond Self-Etch (Heraeus Kulzer) on etched substrate; and group 4, iBond Self-Etch (control). Enamel and dentine bond strengths were calculated using microshear and microtensile bond-strength tests. Additional specimens were prepared to evaluate nanoleakage at the dentine-adhesive interface and were investigated using light microscopy or transmission electron microscopy. Both adhesives demonstrated higher microshear bond strengths when enamel was pre-acid-etched with phosphoric acid (Adper Easy Bond 28.7 ± 4.8 MPa; iBond Self-Etch 19.7 ± 3.6 MPa) compared with controls (Adper Easy Bond 19.2 ± 3.3 MPa; iBond Self-Etch 17.5 ± 2.7 MPa) and increased microtensile bond strength when applied on acid-etched (Adper Easy Bond 35.8 ± 5.7 MPa; iBond Self-Etch 24.3 ± 7.9 MPa) vs. smear-layer-covered dentine (Adper Easy Bond 26.9 ± 6.2 MPa; iBond Self-Etch 17.6 ± 4.3 MPa). Adper Easy Bond showed lower nanoleakage than iBond Self-Etch, irrespective of preliminary etching. The results of this study support the use of phosphoric acid etching before the application of one-step self-etch adhesive systems.

摘要

本研究的目的是分析在应用两种一步法自酸蚀粘结系统之前,对牙釉质和牙本质进行磷酸预处理酸蚀的效果。将这些系统应用于酸蚀或有玷污层覆盖的牙釉质和牙本质上。治疗组如下:第1组,在酸蚀后的基底上应用Adper Easy Bond(3M ESPE);第2组,Adper Easy Bond(对照组);第3组,在酸蚀后的基底上应用iBond自酸蚀粘结剂(贺利氏古莎);第4组,iBond自酸蚀粘结剂(对照组)。使用微剪切和微拉伸粘结强度测试来计算牙釉质和牙本质的粘结强度。制备额外的样本以评估牙本质-粘结剂界面处的纳米渗漏情况,并使用光学显微镜或透射电子显微镜进行观察。与对照组(Adper Easy Bond 19.2±3.3 MPa;iBond自酸蚀粘结剂17.5±2.7 MPa)相比,当牙釉质先用磷酸进行酸蚀预处理时,两种粘结剂均表现出更高的微剪切粘结强度(Adper Easy Bond 28.7±4.8 MPa;iBond自酸蚀粘结剂19.7±3.6 MPa),并且当应用于酸蚀后的牙本质(Adper Easy Bond 35.8±5.7 MPa;iBond自酸蚀粘结剂24.3±7.9 MPa)时,微拉伸粘结强度增加,而应用于有玷污层覆盖的牙本质时(Adper Easy Bond 26.9±6.2 MPa;iBond自酸蚀粘结剂17.6±4.3 MPa)则不然。无论是否进行预处理酸蚀,Adper Easy Bond的纳米渗漏均低于iBond自酸蚀粘结剂。本研究结果支持在应用一步法自酸蚀粘结系统之前使用磷酸酸蚀。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验