Department of Vascular Surgery, Anzhen Hospital Affiliated to the Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Jan;53(1):174-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.06.173. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
Takayasu arteritis (TA) is an autoimmune disease with an unclear etiology and pathophysiology. An antibody-mediated inflammatory response is a known feature of this disease, however, the role of circulating B-lymphocyte production of such antibodies is not known. The objective of this study is to characterize in vitro production of autoimmune antibodies by B-lymphocytes from patients with TA and to examine differences related to disease activity.
Peripheral blood samples were taken from 72 patients with TA and 50 age-matched controls. Among the patients with TA, 42 had active disease while 31 had inactive disease. The Sharma modified criteria were used for diagnosis, and the National Institutes of Health criteria were used for TA activity assessment. Levels of autoantibodies in culture supernatant of circulating B-lymphocytes, including anti-endothelial cell antibody (AECA), anti-cardiolipin antibody (ACA), anti-beta(2) glycoprotein-I antibody (aβ₂GPI), and anti-annexin V antibody (AAVA), were assayed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in each participant.
In vitro levels of AECA, ACA, aβ₂GPI, and AAVA from circulating B-lymphocytes were significantly increased in TA patients compared with controls (AECA: 0.6 ± 0.36 vs 0.18 ± 0.09, P < .001; ACA: 0.69 ± 0.22 vs 0.54 ± 0.13, P < .001; aβ₂GPI: 0.99 ± 0.19 vs 0.83 ± 0.07, P< .001; AAVA: 0.62 ± 0.26 vs 0.41 ± 0.44, P < .001). In vitro levels of AECA, ACA, and AAVA from circulating B-lymphocytes in active TA were higher than those in inactive TA (AECA: 0.85 ± 0.29 vs 0.28 ± 0.10, P < .001; ACA: 0.79 ± 0.21 vs 0.56 ± 0.15, P < .001; AAVA: 0.82 ± 0.16 vs 0.36 ± 0.06, P < .001). No difference was found in the in vitro level of aβ₂GPI between active TA and inactive TA (1.01 ± 0.17 vs 0.96 ± 0.22, P = .115). In vitro levels of AECA, ACA, and AAVA from circulating B-lymphocytes in inactive TA showed no statistic difference with those in controls (AECA: 0.28 ± 0.10 vs 0.18 ± 0.09, P = .096; ACA: 0.56 ± 0.15 vs 0.54 ± 0.13, P = .699; AAVA: 0.36 ± 0.06 vs 0.41 ± 0.44, P = .200). In vitro levels of aβ₂GPI in inactive TA were higher than those in controls (0.96 ± 0.22 vs 0.83 ± 0.07, P < .001).
This study characterizes in vitro production of autoantibodies by circulating B-lymphocytes from patients with TA. Differences in production from those with active versus inactive disease suggest that phenotypic alterations in this cell type may play an important role in pathogenesis.
Takayasu 动脉炎(TA)是一种病因和病理生理学尚不清楚的自身免疫性疾病。已知这种疾病存在抗体介导的炎症反应,但循环 B 淋巴细胞产生此类抗体的作用尚不清楚。本研究的目的是描述 TA 患者循环 B 淋巴细胞体外产生自身抗体的特征,并研究与疾病活动度相关的差异。
采集 72 例 TA 患者和 50 例年龄匹配的对照者外周血样。其中 42 例 TA 患者处于活动期,31 例处于缓解期。采用 Sharma 改良标准诊断,采用 NIH 标准评估 TA 活动度。采用酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)检测每位参与者循环 B 淋巴细胞培养上清液中抗内皮细胞抗体(AECA)、抗心磷脂抗体(ACA)、抗β2 糖蛋白 I 抗体(aβ₂GPI)和抗 Annexin V 抗体(AAVA)的水平。
与对照组相比,TA 患者循环 B 淋巴细胞体外产生的 AECA、ACA、aβ₂GPI 和 AAVA 水平显著升高(AECA:0.6 ± 0.36 比 0.18 ± 0.09,P <.001;ACA:0.69 ± 0.22 比 0.54 ± 0.13,P <.001;aβ₂GPI:0.99 ± 0.19 比 0.83 ± 0.07,P<.001;AAVA:0.62 ± 0.26 比 0.41 ± 0.44,P <.001)。与缓解期 TA 患者相比,活动期 TA 患者循环 B 淋巴细胞体外产生的 AECA、ACA 和 AAVA 水平更高(AECA:0.85 ± 0.29 比 0.28 ± 0.10,P <.001;ACA:0.79 ± 0.21 比 0.56 ± 0.15,P <.001;AAVA:0.82 ± 0.16 比 0.36 ± 0.06,P <.001)。但活动期和缓解期 TA 患者循环 B 淋巴细胞体外产生的 aβ₂GPI 水平无差异(1.01 ± 0.17 比 0.96 ± 0.22,P =.115)。缓解期 TA 患者循环 B 淋巴细胞体外产生的 AECA、ACA 和 AAVA 水平与对照组相比无统计学差异(AECA:0.28 ± 0.10 比 0.18 ± 0.09,P =.096;ACA:0.56 ± 0.15 比 0.54 ± 0.13,P =.699;AAVA:0.36 ± 0.06 比 0.41 ± 0.44,P =.200)。但缓解期 TA 患者循环 B 淋巴细胞体外产生的 aβ₂GPI 水平高于对照组(0.96 ± 0.22 比 0.83 ± 0.07,P <.001)。
本研究描述了 TA 患者循环 B 淋巴细胞体外产生自身抗体的特征。与活动期与缓解期患者相比,产生抗体的差异提示这种细胞类型的表型改变可能在发病机制中起重要作用。