• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头位转动对空间忽视患者基于空间和基于词的阅读错误的影响。

Effects of head rotation on space- and word-based reading errors in spatial neglect.

机构信息

Saarland University, Clinical Neuropsychology Unit, Saarbruecken, Germany.

出版信息

Neuropsychologia. 2010 Nov;48(13):3706-14. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.09.006. Epub 2010 Sep 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.09.006
PMID:20833189
Abstract

Patients with right hemisphere lesions often omit or misread words on the left side of a text or the beginning letters of single words which is termed neglect dyslexia (ND). Two types of reading errors are typically observed in ND: omissions and word-based reading errors. The prior are considered as space-based omission errors on the contralesional side of the page, while the latter can be viewed as a kind of stimulus- or word-based reading errors where leftsided parts of a single perceptual entity (the word) are neglected. The head, trunk and eyes are part of a hypothetical egocentric reference frame that is aligned around our body and divides space into a left and right hemispace. Previous neglect studies have shown that head- and trunk-orientation significantly influence contralesional neglect. An open question is whether such egocentric manipulations also influence omissions and word-based errors in paragraph reading in ND. The current study investigated in a sample of right-hemisphere lesioned patients with ND vs. without ND and matched healthy control subjects the influence of head-rotation (HR) on both types of reading errors using controlled indented paragraph reading tests. Passive leftward HR significantly reduced omission errors on the left side of the text in ND, but had no effect on word-based reading errors. In conclusion egocentric manipulations like HR only appear to influence space-based attentional processes in neglect evident as omissions in paragraph reading but have no impact on those attentional processes involved in word identification evident as word-based errors in paragraph reading.

摘要

右侧大脑损伤的患者经常会遗漏或读错文本左侧的单词或单词的起始字母,这被称为忽视性失读症(ND)。ND 通常会观察到两种类型的阅读错误:遗漏和基于单词的阅读错误。前者被认为是页面对侧的基于空间的遗漏错误,而后者可以看作是一种基于刺激或基于单词的阅读错误,其中单个感知实体(单词)的左侧部分被忽略。头、躯干和眼睛是假设的以自我为中心的参考框架的一部分,该框架围绕着我们的身体,并将空间分为左右半空间。以前的忽视研究表明,头和躯干的朝向显著影响对侧忽视。一个悬而未决的问题是,这种以自我为中心的操作是否也会影响 ND 患者段落阅读中的遗漏和基于单词的错误。本研究使用受控缩进段落阅读测试,在 ND 患者与无 ND 患者和匹配的健康对照组中,调查了头部旋转(HR)对这两种阅读错误的影响。被动的向左 HR 显著减少了 ND 患者文本左侧的遗漏错误,但对基于单词的阅读错误没有影响。总之,像 HR 这样的以自我为中心的操作似乎只影响忽视中基于空间的注意过程,表现为段落阅读中的遗漏,但对涉及单词识别的注意过程没有影响,表现为段落阅读中的基于单词的错误。

相似文献

1
Effects of head rotation on space- and word-based reading errors in spatial neglect.头位转动对空间忽视患者基于空间和基于词的阅读错误的影响。
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Nov;48(13):3706-14. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.09.006. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
2
Optokinetic stimulation affects word omissions but not stimulus-centered reading errors in paragraph reading in neglect dyslexia.视动刺激影响词缺失,但不影响忽视性阅读障碍患者在段落阅读中以刺激为中心的阅读错误。
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Jul;49(9):2728-35. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.05.022. Epub 2011 Jun 6.
3
Line bisection error predicts the presence and severity of neglect dyslexia in paragraph reading.直线分段错误预测了段落阅读中忽视性阅读障碍的存在和严重程度。
Neuropsychologia. 2013 Jan;51(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.10.026. Epub 2012 Nov 7.
4
The frequency and significance of the word length effect in neglect dyslexia.忽视性失读症中词长效应的频率和意义。
Neuropsychologia. 2013 Jun;51(7):1273-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.03.006. Epub 2013 Mar 22.
5
Neglect dyslexia: frequency, association with other hemispatial neglects, and lesion localization.忽视性失读症:发生率、与其他半侧空间忽视的关联以及病灶定位。
Neuropsychologia. 2009 Feb;47(3):704-10. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.11.027. Epub 2008 Nov 30.
6
Neglect dyslexia: a matter of "good looking".忽视诵读困难:关乎“好看”的问题。
Neuropsychologia. 2013 Sep;51(11):2109-19. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.07.002. Epub 2013 Jul 10.
7
Task-dependent modulation of neglect dyslexia? Novel evidence from the viewing position effect.忽视性阅读障碍的任务依赖型调制?来自观看位置效应的新证据。
Brain Res. 2008 Jan 16;1189:166-78. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.10.069. Epub 2007 Nov 12.
8
Two different mechanisms for omission and substitution errors in neglect dyslexia.忽视性失读症中遗漏和替换错误的两种不同机制。
Neurocase. 2011;17(2):122-32. doi: 10.1080/13554794.2010.498382. Epub 2010 Sep 1.
9
Rotation or translation of auditory space in neglect? A case study of chronic right-sided neglect.忽视症中听觉空间的旋转或平移?一例慢性右侧忽视症的病例研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(6):923-30. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.08.011. Epub 2005 Oct 26.
10
The effect of syntax on reading in neglect dyslexia.句法对忽视性诵读困难症阅读的影响。
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Aug;49(10):2803-16. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.05.023. Epub 2011 Jun 6.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effects of a Novel Treatment for Hemianopic Dyslexia on Reading, Symptom Load, and Return to Work.一种新型偏盲性阅读障碍治疗方法对阅读、症状负荷及重返工作的影响
Brain Sci. 2024 Mar 6;14(3):259. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14030259.
2
Neglect dyslexia: whole-word and within-word errors with parafoveal and foveal viewing.忽视诵读困难:周边和中央凹视野下的整词和词内错误。
Exp Brain Res. 2023 Dec;241(11-12):2655-2668. doi: 10.1007/s00221-023-06708-4. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
3
Assessment of visual space recognition of patients with unilateral spatial neglect and visual field defects using a head mounted display system.
使用头戴式显示系统评估单侧空间忽视和视野缺损患者的视觉空间识别能力。
J Phys Ther Sci. 2016 Jan;28(2):332-8. doi: 10.1589/jpts.28.332. Epub 2016 Feb 29.