• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

忽视性失读症中词长效应的频率和意义。

The frequency and significance of the word length effect in neglect dyslexia.

机构信息

Saarland University, Clinical Neuropsychology Unit and Outpatient Service, Building A1.3, D-66123 Saarbruecken, Germany.

出版信息

Neuropsychologia. 2013 Jun;51(7):1273-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.03.006. Epub 2013 Mar 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.03.006
PMID:23528849
Abstract

Neglect patients often omit or misread initial letters of single words, a phenomenon termed neglect dyslexia (ND). Omissions of whole words on the contralesional side of the page during paragraph reading are generally considered as egocentric or space-based errors, whereas misreading of the left part of a word can be viewed as a type of stimulus-centred or word-based, neglect-related error. The research of the last decades shed light on several effects of word features (such as written word frequency, grammatical class or concreteness) that modulate the severity of ND. Nevertheless, almost all studies about those modulating factors were case studies and some of them have not been replicated yet. Therefore, to date we do not know how relevant such effects of different word stimuli are for a population of ND patients. Knowing their incidence would improve our theoretical understanding of ND and promote the development of standardized ND assessments, which are lacking so far. In particular, case studies have shown that ND error frequency increases systematically with word length (word length effect, WLE) while other single case studies found contrary results. Hence, the existence of the WLE in ND is unsettled and its incidence and significance in stroke patients is unknown. To clarify this issue we evaluated the relation between word length and the extent (number) of neglected or substituted letters within single words in ND (neglect dyslexia extent, NDE) in a group of 19 consecutive ND patients with right hemisphere lesions. We found a clear WLE in 79% (15 of 19) of our ND patients, as indicated by significant correlations between word length and NDE. Concurrent visual field defects had no effect on the WLE in our sample, thus showing no influence of early visual cortical processing stages on the WLE in neglect dyslexia. In conclusion, our results suggest a clear relationship between word length and reading errors in ND and show that the WLE is a frequent phenomenon in ND.

摘要

忽略症患者经常遗漏或误读单词的首字母,这种现象被称为忽略性失读症(ND)。在阅读段落时,对侧页面上的整词遗漏通常被认为是自我中心或基于空间的错误,而对单词左半部分的误读则可以被视为一种以刺激为中心或以单词为中心的、与忽略相关的错误。过去几十年的研究揭示了几个影响单词特征(如单词的书写频率、语法类别或具体性)的因素,这些因素会调节 ND 的严重程度。然而,几乎所有关于这些调节因素的研究都是病例研究,其中一些尚未得到复制。因此,到目前为止,我们还不知道不同单词刺激对 ND 患者群体的相关程度。了解其发生率将有助于我们从理论上更好地理解 ND,并促进目前缺乏的 ND 标准化评估的发展。特别是,病例研究表明,ND 错误频率会随着单词长度的增加而系统增加(单词长度效应,WLE),而其他一些单一病例研究则得出了相反的结果。因此,ND 中是否存在 WLE 尚未确定,其在中风患者中的发生率和意义也尚不清楚。为了澄清这一问题,我们评估了在 19 名连续的右侧大脑半球损伤 ND 患者中,单词长度与 ND 中单个单词被忽略或替代的字母数量(忽略性失读程度,NDE)之间的关系。我们发现,在我们的 19 名 ND 患者中,有 79%(15 名)存在明显的 WLE,这表明单词长度与 NDE 之间存在显著相关性。同时存在的视野缺损对我们样本中的 WLE 没有影响,这表明在忽略性失读中,早期视觉皮层处理阶段对 WLE 没有影响。总之,我们的结果表明 ND 中存在单词长度与阅读错误之间的明显关系,并表明 WLE 是 ND 中常见的现象。

相似文献

1
The frequency and significance of the word length effect in neglect dyslexia.忽视性失读症中词长效应的频率和意义。
Neuropsychologia. 2013 Jun;51(7):1273-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.03.006. Epub 2013 Mar 22.
2
Line bisection error predicts the presence and severity of neglect dyslexia in paragraph reading.直线分段错误预测了段落阅读中忽视性阅读障碍的存在和严重程度。
Neuropsychologia. 2013 Jan;51(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.10.026. Epub 2012 Nov 7.
3
Optokinetic stimulation affects word omissions but not stimulus-centered reading errors in paragraph reading in neglect dyslexia.视动刺激影响词缺失,但不影响忽视性阅读障碍患者在段落阅读中以刺激为中心的阅读错误。
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Jul;49(9):2728-35. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.05.022. Epub 2011 Jun 6.
4
Effects of head rotation on space- and word-based reading errors in spatial neglect.头位转动对空间忽视患者基于空间和基于词的阅读错误的影响。
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Nov;48(13):3706-14. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.09.006. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
5
Neglect dyslexia: frequency, association with other hemispatial neglects, and lesion localization.忽视性失读症:发生率、与其他半侧空间忽视的关联以及病灶定位。
Neuropsychologia. 2009 Feb;47(3):704-10. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.11.027. Epub 2008 Nov 30.
6
Task-dependent modulation of neglect dyslexia? Novel evidence from the viewing position effect.忽视性阅读障碍的任务依赖型调制?来自观看位置效应的新证据。
Brain Res. 2008 Jan 16;1189:166-78. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.10.069. Epub 2007 Nov 12.
7
Neglect dyslexia: a matter of "good looking".忽视诵读困难:关乎“好看”的问题。
Neuropsychologia. 2013 Sep;51(11):2109-19. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.07.002. Epub 2013 Jul 10.
8
Neglect dyslexia as a word-centred impairment: A single case study.忽视以单词为中心的障碍:一个单一案例研究。
Cortex. 2019 Oct;119:543-554. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.10.024. Epub 2018 Nov 10.
9
The neural correlates of object-centered processing in reading: a lesion study of neglect dyslexia.阅读中以物体为中心的加工的神经关联:忽视性阅读障碍的病变研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2012 May;50(6):1142-50. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.036. Epub 2011 Oct 1.
10
Neglect dyslexia: a review of the neuropsychological literature.忽视诵读困难:神经心理学文献综述。
Exp Brain Res. 2010 Oct;206(2):219-35. doi: 10.1007/s00221-010-2386-0. Epub 2010 Aug 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Visual attention matters during word recognition: A Bayesian modeling approach.单词识别过程中视觉注意力很重要:一种贝叶斯建模方法。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Jun;32(3):1165-1203. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02591-4. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
2
The Effects of a Novel Treatment for Hemianopic Dyslexia on Reading, Symptom Load, and Return to Work.一种新型偏盲性阅读障碍治疗方法对阅读、症状负荷及重返工作的影响
Brain Sci. 2024 Mar 6;14(3):259. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14030259.