Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Gyn. Mott, Plan 2, Helsingborgs Hospital, 25187 Helsingborg, Sweden.
Midwifery. 2011 Dec;27(6):e188-94. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2010.07.001. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
To measure the extent to which documented Swedish midwifery care for low-risk labour and birth followed the World Health Organization's (WHO) recommendations for care in normal birth, and to compare midwifery care given to women who's labours were classified as low and high risk.
A retrospective examination of midwifery and medical records, 144 from women with low-risk births and 54 from women with high-risk births, for aspects of pregnancy, labour and birth using a validated instrument based on WHO's recommendations.
Southern Sweden.
Care given in accordance with WHO's four categories of practice and changes in risk group during the birth process.
Care interventions not recommended by WHO, such as routine establishment of an intravenous route, routine amniotomy during the first stage, continuous electronic fetal monitoring and pharmacological methods of pain relief, were widespread in the records. Documented care differed little between the labours of women at low risk and high risk. The midwives at the unit under study did not routinely carry out risk assessment.
The mode of care was one of readiness for medical intervention. The act of carrying out risk assessments at the time of the woman's admission may affect awareness of the level of care offered to birthing women, and thus help to reduce the number and variety of practices not recommended by WHO.
衡量瑞典记录在案的低风险分娩和生育护理在多大程度上遵循了世界卫生组织(WHO)关于正常分娩护理的建议,并比较低风险和高风险产妇的助产护理。
回顾性检查了 144 名低风险分娩妇女和 54 名高风险分娩妇女的助产和医疗记录,使用基于世卫组织建议的经过验证的工具,从妊娠、分娩和分娩等方面进行评估。
瑞典南部。
根据世卫组织的四个实践类别进行的护理以及分娩过程中风险组的变化。
记录中广泛存在世卫组织不推荐的护理干预措施,如常规建立静脉通路、第一产程常规人工破膜、连续电子胎儿监护和药物缓解疼痛的方法。低风险和高风险产妇的分娩护理差异不大。研究单位的助产士没有常规进行风险评估。
护理模式是为医疗干预做好准备的模式。在女性入院时进行风险评估的行为可能会影响对分娩女性提供护理水平的认识,从而有助于减少世卫组织不推荐的做法的数量和种类。