• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

氨丁三醇治疗晚期癌症患者便秘的疗效和耐受性:对泻药抵抗的便秘。

Effectiveness and tolerability of amidotrizoate for the treatment of constipation resistant to laxatives in advanced cancer patients.

机构信息

Pain Relief and Palliative Care Unit, La Maddalena Cancer Center, Palermo, Italy.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Feb;41(2):421-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.04.022. Epub 2010 Sep 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.04.022
PMID:20833504
Abstract

CONTEXT

Constipation is a common problem for advanced cancer patients, and is generally inadequately treated.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of amidotrizoate (AM) in patients unresponsive to current laxatives.

METHODS

A consecutive sample of advanced cancer patients was surveyed. Inclusion criteria were no bowel movements for three days despite receiving regular doses of senna or lactulose. AM 50 mL was administered orally; the dose could be repeated the day after, based on clinical judgment and/or patients' preference. Age, sex, primary tumor, previous abdominal surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy performed in the previous month, and the use of opioids were recorded. Nausea, the presence of early satiety, and fluid and food intake also were measured. Time to first bowel movement was recorded, and adverse effects attributable to AM.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine patients were surveyed (36 women/63 men). The mean age was 65.7 years (SD±12.2) and the mean Karnofsky score was 46.8 (SD±9.4). Patients had no bowel movement for a mean of four days (SD±1.8, range 3-15 days). A total of 80.8% of patients were receiving opioids in doses of mean daily oral morphine equivalents of 164 mg (SD±235). After AM administration (mean 9.9±6.5 hours), 44.4% of patients had a bowel movement within 24 hours. This effect was associated with significant improvement of other symptoms and was independent of age (P=0.513), gender (P=0.090), Karnofsky status (P=0.979), days of constipation (P=0.198), concomitant chemotherapy (P=0.098) or radiotherapy (P=0.414), the use of opioids (P=0.361), opioid doses (P=0.420), and primary tumor (P=0.231). The treatment was more effective in patients who had previous abdominal surgery (HR=3.33).

CONCLUSION

AM was found to be an easy and inexpensive breakthrough medication to induce a bowel movement in about 45% of advanced cancer patients not responsive to common laxatives, with limited and acceptable adverse effects.

摘要

背景

便秘是晚期癌症患者的常见问题,通常治疗不足。

目的

本研究旨在前瞻性评估氨芐蝶啶(AM)在对现有泻药无反应的患者中的疗效和耐受性。

方法

对连续样本的晚期癌症患者进行调查。纳入标准为尽管接受了常规剂量的番泻叶或乳果糖,但连续三天没有排便。口服 AM 50 毫升;根据临床判断和/或患者的偏好,可在第二天重复剂量。记录年龄、性别、原发肿瘤、既往腹部手术、前一个月接受的化疗和放疗以及阿片类药物的使用情况。还测量了恶心、早饱感以及液体和食物的摄入。记录首次排便的时间,并记录与 AM 相关的不良反应。

结果

共调查了 99 例患者(36 例女性/63 例男性)。平均年龄为 65.7 岁(标准差±12.2),平均卡诺夫斯基评分 46.8(标准差±9.4)。患者平均无排便 4 天(标准差±1.8,范围 3-15 天)。80.8%的患者接受阿片类药物治疗,平均每日口服吗啡等效剂量为 164 毫克(标准差±235)。给予 AM 后(平均 9.9±6.5 小时),44.4%的患者在 24 小时内排便。这种效果与其他症状的显著改善相关,与年龄(P=0.513)、性别(P=0.090)、卡诺夫斯基状态(P=0.979)、便秘天数(P=0.198)、同期化疗(P=0.098)或放疗(P=0.414)、阿片类药物的使用(P=0.361)、阿片类药物剂量(P=0.420)和原发肿瘤(P=0.231)无关。对于有既往腹部手术史的患者(HR=3.33),AM 是一种更有效的治疗方法。

结论

AM 被发现是一种简单且廉价的突破性药物,可使约 45%对常用泻药无反应的晚期癌症患者产生排便,不良反应有限且可接受。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness and tolerability of amidotrizoate for the treatment of constipation resistant to laxatives in advanced cancer patients.氨丁三醇治疗晚期癌症患者便秘的疗效和耐受性:对泻药抵抗的便秘。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Feb;41(2):421-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.04.022. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
2
Open-label, dose-ranging pilot study of 4 weeks of low-dose therapy with sodium phosphate tablets in chronically constipated adults.慢性便秘成人患者使用磷酸钠片进行为期4周的低剂量治疗的开放标签、剂量范围探索性试验。
Clin Ther. 2004 Sep;26(9):1479-91. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2004.09.007.
3
[Participation in the expert forum "constipation and laxatives" 24 February 1999 in Vienna. Constipation and laxatives].[1999年2月24日参加维也纳举行的“便秘与泻药”专家论坛。便秘与泻药]
Praxis (Bern 1994). 1999 Aug 15;88(31-32):1269-74.
4
Use and abuse of laxatives.泻药的使用与滥用。
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1977 Mar;34(3):291-300.
5
[Laxatives in chronic constipation].
Med Monatsschr Pharm. 1996 Nov;19(11):337-8.
6
[Treatment of constipation and different laxative requirements in palliative medicine].[姑息医学中便秘的治疗及不同的泻药需求]
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2000 Sep;94(7):563-7.
7
Current approaches to the management of constipation.便秘的当前管理方法。
Cancer Surv. 1994;21:137-46.
8
Effectiveness of aroma massage on advanced cancer patients with constipation: a pilot study.香薰按摩对晚期癌症便秘患者的疗效:一项初步研究。
Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2011 Feb;17(1):37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2010.02.004. Epub 2010 Jun 12.
9
Neostigmine for refractory constipation in advanced cancer patients.新斯的明用于晚期癌症患者难治性便秘
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2006 Sep;32(3):204-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.05.002.
10
A review of laxative therapies for treatment of chronic constipation in older adults.老年人慢性便秘治疗中泻药疗法的综述。
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2010 Dec;8(6):514-50. doi: 10.1016/S1543-5946(10)80003-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Public Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice on Herbal Remedies Used During Pregnancy and Lactation in West Bank Palestine.巴勒斯坦约旦河西岸地区关于孕期和哺乳期使用草药疗法的公众知识、态度及实践情况
Front Pharmacol. 2020 Feb 14;11:46. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00046. eCollection 2020.
2
PEG vs. sennosides for opioid-induced constipation in cancer care.PEG 与番泻叶对比治疗癌症治疗中阿片类药物引起的便秘。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Apr;28(4):1775-1782. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04944-5. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
3
[Is the pharmacological treatment of constipation in palliative care evidence based? : a systematic literature review].
[姑息治疗中便秘的药物治疗是否有循证依据?:一项系统文献综述]
Schmerz. 2012 Sep;26(5):568-86. doi: 10.1007/s00482-012-1246-1.