Lesi O A, Orenuga O O, Roberts A, Abudu O O
Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, PMB 12003, Idi-Araba, Lagos.
Nig Q J Hosp Med. 2009 Apr-Jun;19(2):119-24.
The research productivity of medical faculty has been well studied in developed countries, unlike in the developing countries.
This study proposes to assess the level of research productivity over a 2 year period and identify the challenges to conducting research among junior academic staff of the College of Medicine, University of Lagos.
An observational cross-sectional study in which the 120 junior academic staff from both basic sciences and clinical sciences were evaluated between January and September 2005. Data collection was by self-administered questionnaires distributed to the study population.
There were 83 (69.1%) respondents comprising 38 males (45.6%) and 45 females (54.2%). The median age group was 31-40 years. Most respondents (57, 83%) spent less than 10 hours/week on research. On average they had completed 3-4 scholarly articles within the past 2 years. Nineteen (21.7%) of the subjects were considered to have optimal research productivity having completed over 5 scholarly research papers. The lecturers with optimal research productivity were significantly more likely to be male, and spent over 10 hours a week in hospital related clinical and laboratory related activities. (p = 0.02, and p = 0.03). Inadequate funding and laboratory facilities, and poor technological infrastructure were the most common causes of impediments to research reported by 78%, 69% and 55% of the lecturers respectively.
Optimal research productivity was seen in about one quarter of the study population and was associated with male gender and prolonged duration of clinical/laboratory activities. Negligible research financing and poor laboratory support were major impediments to research productivity.
与发展中国家不同,发达国家对医学教师的研究生产力进行了充分研究。
本研究旨在评估两年期间的研究生产力水平,并确定拉各斯大学医学院初级学术人员开展研究面临的挑战。
2005年1月至9月,对基础科学和临床科学的120名初级学术人员进行了观察性横断面研究。通过向研究人群发放自填式问卷收集数据。
有83名(69.1%)受访者,其中男性38名(45.6%),女性45名(54.2%)。年龄中位数组为31 - 40岁。大多数受访者(57名,83%)每周花在研究上的时间少于10小时。在过去两年里,他们平均完成了3 - 4篇学术文章。19名(21.7%)受试者被认为具有最佳研究生产力,完成了5篇以上的学术研究论文。具有最佳研究生产力的讲师更有可能是男性,并且每周花超过10小时在医院相关临床和实验室相关活动上。(p = 0.02,p = 0.03)。资金不足、实验室设施和技术基础设施差分别是78%、69%和55%的讲师报告的研究障碍的最常见原因。
约四分之一的研究人群具有最佳研究生产力,这与男性性别以及临床/实验室活动时间延长有关。可忽略不计的研究资金和糟糕的实验室支持是研究生产力的主要障碍。