Schneider Christopher R, Gauderer Michael W L, Blackhurst Dawn, Chandler John C, Abrams Randel S
Department of Surgery, Greenville Hospital System University Medical Center, Greenville, South Carolina 29605, USA.
Am Surg. 2010 Sep;76(9):957-61.
The use and effectiveness of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for the treatment of empyema and complex parapneumonic collections in pediatric patients is well documented. Timing of this intervention still remains controversial. We reviewed our experience with VATS to determine if it should be used as the initial procedure in children with pleural collections. We reviewed all pediatric (age younger than 17 years) patients with a diagnosis of pneumonia admitted between July 1998 and June 2008. Demographics, comorbidities, laboratory data, and hospital length of stay (LOS) were evaluated. Patients were divided into groups: those who only had thoracentesis or thoracostomy (Group A), those who underwent a procedure and then required VATS (Group B), and those who went directly to VATS (Group C). We identified 382 patients admitted with pneumonia. Of these, 79 (21%) required a thoracic drainage procedure. Overall, 49 (67%) of patients with a thoracic fluid collection underwent VATS at some point. With regard to type of intervention, there was no statistical difference noted in clinical variables. Thirty (38%) patients were in Group A, 18 (22%) in Group B, and 31 (39%) in Group C. LOS for Group C (10.5 days) was significantly (P < 0.05) shorter than for both Group A (14.8 days) and Group B (15 days). Only two (6%) patients required conversion to open thoracotomy. A high percentage of children initially treated by tube thoracostomy eventually require additional interventions, leading to increased LOS. As a result of its simplicity, safety, and efficacy, VATS pleural evacuation can be recommended as the initial intervention in pediatric parapneumonic effusions and empyema in patients who do not require emergent drainage.
电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)用于治疗小儿脓胸和复杂性类肺炎性胸腔积液的应用及疗效已有充分记录。这种干预措施的时机仍存在争议。我们回顾了我们使用VATS的经验,以确定它是否应作为胸膜腔积液患儿的初始手术方法。我们回顾了1998年7月至2008年6月期间收治的所有诊断为肺炎的儿科(年龄小于17岁)患者。评估了人口统计学、合并症、实验室数据和住院时间(LOS)。患者分为几组:仅进行胸腔穿刺或胸腔造口术的患者(A组),接受了一次手术然后需要VATS的患者(B组),以及直接进行VATS的患者(C组)。我们确定了382例因肺炎入院的患者。其中,79例(21%)需要进行胸腔引流手术。总体而言,49例(67%)有胸腔积液的患者在某个时间点接受了VATS。关于干预类型,临床变量方面未发现统计学差异。A组有30例(38%)患者,B组有18例(22%)患者,C组有31例(39%)患者。C组的住院时间(10.5天)明显短于A组(14.8天)和B组(15天)(P<0.05)。只有2例(6%)患者需要转为开胸手术。最初接受胸腔闭式引流术治疗的儿童中有很大比例最终需要额外的干预,导致住院时间延长。由于其操作简单、安全且有效,对于不需要紧急引流的小儿类肺炎性胸腔积液和脓胸患者,VATS胸膜腔引流可作为初始干预措施推荐使用。