• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经尿道膀胱手术中闭孔神经经膀胱前路阻滞预防内收肌收缩。

Transvesical blockade of the obturator nerve to prevent adductor contraction in transurethral bladder surgery.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2010 Oct;24(10):1651-4. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0659.

DOI:10.1089/end.2009.0659
PMID:20836720
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of transvesical obturator nerve block (ONB) in the prevention of obturator nerve reflex and leg jerking during transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 60 patients were studied, in whom the transurethral resection of tumors on the posterolateral bladder wall were performed under spinal anesthesia (SA). The patients were randomly divided into two groups. In the first group, we performed transvesical ONB and SA together, while the second group received only SA. The patients underwent TURBT using monopolar cautery. Incidence of leg jerking was registered and compared in these two groups. We used a nerve stimulator to detect the obturator nerve next to the lateral bladder wall. The obturator nerve was identified by its response to nerve stimulation. Then, 10 mL of 1% lidocaine was slowly injected through the working channel of a cystoscope.

RESULTS

In the intervention group, 34 ONBs (4 bilateral and 26 unilateral) were tried. We could not detect the obturator nerve by nerve stimulation in six patients, and lidocaine injection was carried out blindly in these cases. One patient in the intervention group experienced adductor contraction. Among 30 patients in the control group, 5 patients had leg jerking, and in 2 patients, the procedure ended incompletely because of muscle spasm. Comparing these two groups, transvesical ONB effectively decreased leg jerking during TURBT (16.5% vs 3%; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Local blockade of the obturator nerve during cystoscopy is an effective method to avoid its stimulation in TURBT. It can be performed easily, and we did not experience any serious complication.

摘要

目的

评估经膀胱闭孔神经阻滞(ONB)在预防经尿道膀胱肿瘤电切术(TURBT)中闭孔神经反射和腿部反射的疗效。

方法

共研究了 60 例患者,他们均在脊髓麻醉(SA)下接受后外侧膀胱壁肿瘤的经尿道切除术。患者被随机分为两组。在第一组中,我们同时进行经膀胱 ONB 和 SA,而第二组仅接受 SA。患者使用单极电切进行 TURBT。在这两组中记录并比较腿部反射的发生率。我们使用神经刺激器在侧膀胱壁旁探测闭孔神经。闭孔神经通过对神经刺激的反应来识别。然后,通过膀胱镜的工作通道缓慢注入 10 毫升 1%利多卡因。

结果

在干预组中,尝试了 34 次 ONB(4 次双侧和 26 次单侧)。我们在 6 名患者中无法通过神经刺激检测到闭孔神经,并在这些情况下进行了盲目利多卡因注射。干预组中有 1 名患者出现内收肌收缩。在对照组的 30 名患者中,有 5 名患者出现腿部反射,其中 2 名患者因肌肉痉挛而未能完成手术。将这两组进行比较,经膀胱 ONB 可有效降低 TURBT 期间的腿部反射(16.5%比 3%;P<0.05)。

结论

在膀胱镜检查期间局部阻滞闭孔神经是避免其在 TURBT 中受刺激的有效方法。它可以轻松进行,并且我们没有遇到任何严重的并发症。

相似文献

1
Transvesical blockade of the obturator nerve to prevent adductor contraction in transurethral bladder surgery.经尿道膀胱手术中闭孔神经经膀胱前路阻滞预防内收肌收缩。
J Endourol. 2010 Oct;24(10):1651-4. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0659.
2
Transvesical blockade of the obturator nerve to prevent adductor contraction in transurethral resection of urinary bladder tumor.经膀胱闭孔神经阻滞预防经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术中内收肌收缩。
Urologia. 2024 Nov;91(4):695-700. doi: 10.1177/03915603241266907. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
3
A comparison between blind and nerve stimulation guided obturator nerve block in transurethral resection of bladder tumor.盲探与神经刺激仪引导闭孔神经阻滞在经尿道膀胱肿瘤电切术中的比较。
J Endourol. 2012 Oct;26(10):1319-22. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0037.
4
Effect of obturator nerve block during transurethral resection of lateral bladder wall tumors on the presence of detrusor muscle in tumor specimens and recurrence of the disease.经尿道膀胱侧壁肿瘤切除术中闭孔神经阻滞对肿瘤标本中逼尿肌存在情况及疾病复发的影响。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2017 Feb;33(2):86-90. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2016.11.006. Epub 2016 Dec 30.
5
Transurethral resection of bladder cancer on the lateral bladder wall without obturator nerve block: extent of adductor spasms using the monopolar versus bipolar technique-a prospective randomised study.经尿道膀胱侧壁肿瘤切除术不使用闭孔神经阻滞:单极与双极技术引起内收肌痉挛的程度——一项前瞻性随机研究。
World J Urol. 2018 Jul;36(7):1085-1091. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2248-0. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
6
Obturator nerve block transurethral surgery for bladder cancer: comparison of inguinal and intravesical approaches: prospective randomized trial.闭孔神经阻滞用于经尿道膀胱癌手术:腹股沟入路与膀胱内入路的比较:前瞻性随机试验
Ir J Med Sci. 2016 Aug;185(3):555-560. doi: 10.1007/s11845-015-1300-y. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
7
Effectiveness and Safety of a Modified Technique of Transvesical Obturator Nerve Block to Avoid Adductor Contractions during Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumors.经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术时改良闭孔神经阻滞技术避免内收肌收缩的有效性和安全性。
Urol Int. 2022;106(8):775-783. doi: 10.1159/000520539. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
8
[Blockade of the obturator nerve in transurethral electroresection of urinary bladder tumors].[闭孔神经阻滞在膀胱肿瘤经尿道电切术中的应用]
Urologe A. 1984 May;23(3):171-4.
9
Outcome of transurethral resection of bladder tumour under spinal anaesthesia combined with obturator nerve block in Sri Lanka.斯里兰卡脊髓麻醉联合闭孔神经阻滞下经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术的结果
Urologia. 2023 Feb;90(1):80-82. doi: 10.1177/03915603221127843. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
10
Safety and Efficacy of Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor Comparing Spinal Anesthesia with Spinal Anesthesia with an Obturator Nerve Block: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术中脊髓麻醉与闭孔神经阻滞脊髓麻醉的安全性和疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Endourol. 2021 Mar;35(3):249-258. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.1054. Epub 2020 Dec 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Obturator Nerve Block for Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumors.闭孔神经阻滞在经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术的应用。
Med Arch. 2023 Apr;77(2):118-122. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2023.77.118-122.
2
Comparison of different methods of obturator nerve block in transurethral resection of bladder tumors: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.比较经尿道膀胱肿瘤电切术中不同闭孔神经阻滞方法:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Cancer Med. 2023 Mar;12(5):5420-5435. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5364. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
3
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Spinal Anesthesia and Spinal Anesthesia Combined with Obturator Nerve Block in Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumors.
一项比较脊髓麻醉与脊髓麻醉联合闭孔神经阻滞在经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术中安全性和有效性的系统评价与荟萃分析。
Emerg Med Int. 2022 Jun 29;2022:8490462. doi: 10.1155/2022/8490462. eCollection 2022.
4
Is Obturator Nerve Block Effective as Spinal Anesthesia in Preventing Adductor Spasms in General Anesthesia Without Muscle Relaxants?闭孔神经阻滞在无肌肉松弛剂的全身麻醉中预防内收肌痉挛方面与脊髓麻醉效果相同吗?
Cureus. 2022 Feb 18;14(2):e22365. doi: 10.7759/cureus.22365. eCollection 2022 Feb.
5
Comparison of various types of lasers and transurethral resection in the treatment of bladder tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.比较各种类型的激光和经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术治疗膀胱肿瘤的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lasers Med Sci. 2022 Feb;37(1):95-101. doi: 10.1007/s10103-021-03479-8. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
6
Safety and efficacy of thulium laser resection of bladder tumors versus transurethral resection of bladder tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.钬激光与经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术治疗膀胱肿瘤的安全性和有效性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lasers Med Sci. 2021 Dec;36(9):1807-1816. doi: 10.1007/s10103-021-03272-7. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
7
Avoiding the Obturator Jerk during TURBT.经尿道膀胱肿瘤电切术期间避免闭孔肌反射
Curr Urol. 2018 Oct;12(1):1-5. doi: 10.1159/000447223. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
8
Transurethral resection of bladder cancer on the lateral bladder wall without obturator nerve block: extent of adductor spasms using the monopolar versus bipolar technique-a prospective randomised study.经尿道膀胱侧壁肿瘤切除术不使用闭孔神经阻滞:单极与双极技术引起内收肌痉挛的程度——一项前瞻性随机研究。
World J Urol. 2018 Jul;36(7):1085-1091. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2248-0. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
9
Obturator Nerve Block in Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor: A Comparison of Ultrasound-guided Technique versus Ultrasound with Nerve Stimulation Technique.闭孔神经阻滞在经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术中的应用:超声引导技术与超声联合神经刺激技术的比较
Anesth Essays Res. 2017 Apr-Jun;11(2):411-415. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.194580.
10
Obturator Nerve Block in Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor: A Comparative Study by two Techniques.闭孔神经阻滞在经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术中的应用:两种技术的比较研究
Anesth Essays Res. 2017 Jan-Mar;11(1):101-104. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.184613.