Suppr超能文献

三种吸虫诱捕器在开阔生境中收集白蛉(双翅目:毛蠓科)的比较效果

Comparative efficacy of three suction traps for collecting phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) in open habitats.

作者信息

Faiman Roy, Cuño Ruben, Warburg Alon

机构信息

Department of Parasitology, The Kuvin Centre for the Study of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, The Institute for Medical Research, Israel-Canada (IMRC), The Hebrew University - Hadassah Medical School, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 91120, Israel.

出版信息

J Vector Ecol. 2009 Jun;34(1):114-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1948-7134.2009.00014.x.

Abstract

The efficacy of three suction traps for trapping phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) was compared. Traps were baited with Co(2) and used without any light source. CO(2)-baited CDC traps were evaluated either in their standard downdraft orientation or inverted (iCDC traps). Mosquito Magnet-X (MMX) counterflow geometry traps were tested in the updraft orientation only. Both updraft traps (iCDC and MMX) were deployed with their opening ∼10 cm from the ground while the opening of the downdraft (CDC) trap was ∼40 cm above ground. Comparisons were conducted in two arid locations where different sand fly species prevail. In the Jordan Valley, 3,367 sand flies were caught, 2,370 of which were females. The predominant species was Phlebotomus (Phlebotomus) papatasi, Scopoli 1786 (>99%). The updraft-type traps iCDC and MMX caught an average of 118 and 67.1 sand flies per trap night, respectively. The CDC trap caught 32.9 sand flies on average per night, significantly less than the iCDC traps. In the Judean desert, traps were arranged in a 3 × 3 Latin square design. A total of 565 sand flies were caught, 345 of which were females. The predominant species was P. (Paraphlebotomus) sergenti Parrot 1917 (87%). The updraft traps iCDC and MMX caught an average of 25.6 and 17.9 sand flies per trap per night, respectively. The CDC trap caught 7.8 sand flies on average per night, significantly less than the iCDC traps. The female to male ratio was 1.7 on average for all trap types. In conclusion, updraft traps deployed with their opening close to the ground are clearly more effective for trapping sand flies than downdraft CDC traps in open habitats.

摘要

比较了三种捕蚊器捕捉白蛉(双翅目:蛾蠓科)的效果。捕蚊器用二氧化碳诱饵,且在没有任何光源的情况下使用。用二氧化碳诱饵的疾控中心捕蚊器以标准的向下气流方向或倒置(iCDC捕蚊器)进行评估。灭蚊磁体-X(MMX)逆流式捕蚊器仅在向上气流方向进行测试。两种向上气流捕蚊器(iCDC和MMX)的开口距离地面约10厘米,而向下气流(疾控中心)捕蚊器的开口距离地面约40厘米。在两种不同白蛉种类占优势的干旱地区进行了比较。在约旦河谷,捕获了3367只白蛉,其中2370只为雌性。主要种类是巴氏白蛉(Phlebotomus (Phlebotomus) papatasi),斯科波利,1786年(>99%)。向上气流型捕蚊器iCDC和MMX每捕蚊器每晚平均捕获118只和67.1只白蛉。疾控中心捕蚊器每晚平均捕获32.9只白蛉,明显少于iCDC捕蚊器。在犹地亚沙漠,捕蚊器按3×3拉丁方设计布置。总共捕获了565只白蛉,其中345只为雌性。主要种类是塞尔吉氏白蛉(P. (Paraphlebotomus) sergenti),帕罗特,1917年(87%)。向上气流捕蚊器iCDC和MMX每捕蚊器每晚平均捕获25.6只和17.9只白蛉。疾控中心捕蚊器每晚平均捕获7.8只白蛉,明显少于iCDC捕蚊器。所有捕蚊器类型的雌雄比例平均为1.7。总之,在开放栖息地,开口靠近地面的向上气流捕蚊器在捕捉白蛉方面明显比向下气流的疾控中心捕蚊器更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验