Jacobs G A, Martens M A
Institute for Hygiene and Epidemiology, Division of Toxicology, J. Wytsmanstraat 14, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium.
Toxicol In Vitro. 1988;2(4):253-6. doi: 10.1016/0887-2333(88)90044-6.
The ultrasonic pachometer has been introduced recently into our laboratory for use in the eye-irritation test using enucleated rabbit eyes. We have compared the performance of this kind of pachometer with that of the optical pachometer. The results for corneal swelling, reported by Burton et al. (1981) and obtained using an optic pachometer, were compared with those obtained using an ultrasonic pachometer to test the same 11 substances. The mean corneal swelling 240 min after application of the test substances to four eyes resulted in a very good correlation (r = 0.984) between the optic and ultrasonic pachometer data. A good Spearman rank correlation (r = 0.906; P < 0.0005) was also found between corneal swelling and opacity. The use of the ultrasonic pachometer requires the contact of the ultrasonic probe tip with the corneal epithelium. Although epithelial damage was observed due to probe contact, we were not able to demonstrate that this would influence corneal swelling. The ultrasonic technique is a considerable improvement over the optic technique because:
最近,超声测厚仪已被引入我们实验室,用于在摘除兔眼的眼刺激试验中使用。我们已将这种测厚仪的性能与光学测厚仪的性能进行了比较。将Burton等人(1981年)使用光学测厚仪获得的角膜肿胀结果与使用超声测厚仪测试相同11种物质所获得的结果进行了比较。在将测试物质应用于四只眼睛240分钟后,角膜肿胀的平均值在光学和超声测厚仪数据之间产生了非常好的相关性(r = 0.984)。在角膜肿胀和浑浊之间也发现了良好的斯皮尔曼等级相关性(r = 0.906;P < 0.0005)。超声测厚仪的使用要求超声探头尖端与角膜上皮接触。尽管由于探头接触观察到了上皮损伤,但我们无法证明这会影响角膜肿胀。超声技术相对于光学技术有相当大的改进,因为: