• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

植入式心脏复律除颤器的一级预防的长期获益:多中心自动除颤器植入试验 II 的 8 年延长随访研究。

Long-term benefit of primary prevention with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: an extended 8-year follow-up study of the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II.

机构信息

Heart Research Follow-up Program, Box 653, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.

出版信息

Circulation. 2010 Sep 28;122(13):1265-71. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.940148. Epub 2010 Sep 13.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.940148
PMID:20837894
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II (MADIT-II) showed a significant 31 reduction in the risk of death with primary implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy during a median follow-up of 1.5 years. However, currently there are no data on the long-term efficacy of primary defibrillator therapy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

MADIT-II enrolled 1232 patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction who were randomized to ICD and non-ICD medical therapy and were followed up through November 2001. For the present long-term study, we acquired posttrial mortality data through March 2009 for all study participants (median follow-up, 7.6 years). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression modeling was performed to calculate the hazard ratio for ICD versus non-ICD therapy during long-term follow-up. At 8 years of follow-up, the cumulative probability of all-cause mortality was 49 among patients treated with an ICD compared with 62 among non-ICD patients (P<0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that ICD therapy was associated with a significant long-term survival benefit (hazard ratio for 0- through 8-year mortality=0.66 [95 confidence interval, 0.56 to 0.78]; P<0.001). Treatment with an ICD was shown to be associated with a significant reduction in the risk of death during the early phase of the extended follow-up period (0 through 4 years: hazard ratio=0.61 [95 confidence interval, 0.50 to 0.76]; P<0.001) and with continued life-saving benefit during the late phase of follow-up (5 through 8 years: hazard ratio=0.74 [95 confidence interval, 0.57 to 0.96]; P=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrate a sustained 8-year survival benefit with primary ICD therapy in the MADIT-II population.

摘要

背景

多中心自动除颤器植入试验 II 期(MADIT-II)显示,在中位随访 1.5 年期间,原发性植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)治疗可使死亡率显著降低 31%。然而,目前尚无关于原发性除颤器治疗的长期疗效的数据。

方法和结果

MADIT-II 纳入了 1232 例缺血性左心室功能障碍患者,他们被随机分为 ICD 和非 ICD 药物治疗组,并在 2001 年 11 月前进行随访。为了进行本次长期研究,我们通过 2009 年 3 月获得了所有研究参与者的试验后死亡率数据(中位随访时间为 7.6 年)。采用多变量 Cox 比例风险回归模型计算长期随访期间 ICD 与非 ICD 治疗的风险比。在 8 年的随访中,ICD 治疗组患者的全因死亡率累积概率为 49%,而非 ICD 治疗组患者的全因死亡率累积概率为 62%(P<0.001)。多变量分析表明,ICD 治疗与显著的长期生存获益相关(0 至 8 年死亡率的风险比=0.66[95%置信区间,0.56 至 0.78];P<0.001)。ICD 治疗与扩展随访早期死亡风险显著降低相关(0 至 4 年:风险比=0.61[95%置信区间,0.50 至 0.76];P<0.001),并在随访后期持续具有救生获益(5 至 8 年:风险比=0.74[95%置信区间,0.57 至 0.96];P=0.02)。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,在 MADIT-II 人群中,原发性 ICD 治疗可带来持续 8 年的生存获益。

相似文献

1
Long-term benefit of primary prevention with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: an extended 8-year follow-up study of the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II.植入式心脏复律除颤器的一级预防的长期获益:多中心自动除颤器植入试验 II 的 8 年延长随访研究。
Circulation. 2010 Sep 28;122(13):1265-71. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.940148. Epub 2010 Sep 13.
2
Applicability of a risk score for prediction of the long-term (8-year) benefit of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.用于预测植入式心脏复律除颤器长期(8 年)获益的风险评分的适用性。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Jun 5;59(23):2075-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.02.036.
3
Risk stratification for primary implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator in patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction.缺血性左心室功能不全患者植入心脏复律除颤器的风险分层
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Jan 22;51(3):288-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.08.058.
4
Are MADIT II criteria for implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation appropriate for Chinese patients?MADIT II 标准是否适用于中国患者植入式心脏复律除颤器的植入?
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010 Mar;21(3):231-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2009.01609.x. Epub 2009 Oct 5.
5
Effect of elapsed time from coronary revascularization to implantation of a cardioverter defibrillator on long-term survival in the MADIT-II trial.在 MADIT-II 试验中,从冠状动脉血运重建到植入心脏转复除颤器的时间间隔对长期生存的影响。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2011 Nov;22(11):1237-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2011.02096.x. Epub 2011 May 26.
6
Factors influencing appropriate firing of the implanted defibrillator for ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation: findings from the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II (MADIT-II).影响植入式除颤器对室性心动过速/心室颤动恰当放电的因素:多中心自动除颤器植入试验II(MADIT-II)的研究结果
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Nov 1;46(9):1712-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.05.088. Epub 2005 Oct 10.
7
Relation of body mass index to sudden cardiac death and the benefit of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after healing of myocardial infarction.体重指数与心脏性猝死的关系,以及心肌梗死后左心室功能障碍患者植入式心脏复律除颤器的获益。
Am J Cardiol. 2010 Mar 1;105(5):581-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.10.041. Epub 2010 Jan 22.
8
Efficacy of medical therapy for the reduction of heart failure events in patients with implanted cardioverter defibrillators.药物治疗对降低植入式心脏复律除颤器患者心力衰竭事件的疗效。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009 Apr;20(4):395-400. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2008.01333.x. Epub 2008 Oct 27.
9
Time dependence of defibrillator benefit after coronary revascularization in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial (MADIT)-II.多中心自动除颤器植入试验(MADIT-II)中冠状动脉血运重建术后除颤器获益的时间依赖性。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 May 2;47(9):1811-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.12.048. Epub 2006 Apr 17.
10
Prophylactic use of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator after acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死后植入式心脏复律除颤器的预防性应用。
N Engl J Med. 2004 Dec 9;351(24):2481-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa041489.

引用本文的文献

1
Cardiac Channelopathies: Clinical Diagnosis and Promising Therapeutics.心脏离子通道病:临床诊断与前景广阔的治疗方法
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 May 6;14(9):e040072. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.040072. Epub 2025 Apr 25.
2
The Role of Infarct Border Zone Remodelling in Ventricular Arrhythmias: Bridging Basic Research and Clinical Applications.梗死边缘区重塑在室性心律失常中的作用:连接基础研究与临床应用
J Cell Mol Med. 2025 Apr;29(7):e70526. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.70526.
3
Comparison of Single-Coil Versus Dual-Coil Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Devices: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Extraction-Related Outcomes.
单线圈与双线圈植入式心脏复律除颤器装置的比较:疗效及与拔除相关结局的系统评价和荟萃分析
Clin Cardiol. 2025 Feb;48(2):e70083. doi: 10.1002/clc.70083.
4
ACC/AHA/ASE/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR 2025 Appropriate Use Criteria for Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators, Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy, and Pacing.美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/美国超声心动图学会/美国心力衰竭学会/美国心律学会/心血管造影和介入学会/心血管计算机断层扫描学会/心血管磁共振学会2025年植入式心脏复律除颤器、心脏再同步治疗和起搏的合理使用标准
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2025 Mar 25;85(11):1213-1285. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.11.023. Epub 2025 Jan 13.
5
[Left bundle branch pacing is superior to classic cardiac resynchronisation therapy : Pros and cons].[左束支起搏优于传统心脏再同步治疗:利弊]
Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2024 Dec;35(4):256-262. doi: 10.1007/s00399-024-01054-6. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
6
Benefit of implantable cardioverter defibrillator use in Japanese patients based on modified MADIT-ICD benefit score.基于改良MADIT-ICD获益评分的植入式心脏复律除颤器在日本患者中的应用获益
ESC Heart Fail. 2025 Feb;12(1):369-378. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.15081. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
7
Impact of a Chronic Total Coronary Occlusion on the Incidence of Appropriate Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Shocks and Mortality: A Substudy of the Dutch Outcome in ICD Therapy (DO-IT)) Registry.慢性完全性冠状动脉闭塞对植入式心脏复律除颤器适当电击发生率和死亡率的影响:荷兰 ICD 治疗结局(DO-IT)登记研究的亚组研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Apr 16;13(8):e032033. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.032033. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
8
Primary Electrical Heart Disease-Principles of Pathophysiology and Genetics.原发性心电疾病——病理生理学和遗传学原理。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Feb 2;25(3):1826. doi: 10.3390/ijms25031826.
9
Early ICD implantation following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a retrospective cohort study from the Swedish Registry for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.院外心搏骤停后早期植入 ICD:来自瑞典心肺复苏注册中心的回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 2;14(2):e077137. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077137.
10
Predicting long-term survival after cardioverter-defibrillator implantation for primary prevention: A population based study.心脏复律除颤器植入术一级预防后长期生存预测:一项基于人群的研究。
Heliyon. 2023 Dec 6;10(1):e23355. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23355. eCollection 2024 Jan 15.