Suppr超能文献

[左束支起搏优于传统心脏再同步治疗:利弊]

[Left bundle branch pacing is superior to classic cardiac resynchronisation therapy : Pros and cons].

作者信息

Richter Sergio, Lemke Bernd

机构信息

Sektion Rhythmologie, Klinik für Innere Medizin und Kardiologie, Herzzentrum Dresden, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 76, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland.

Klinik für Kardiologie, Elektrophysiologie und Angiologie, Klinikum Lüdenscheid, Märkische Kliniken GmbH, Lüdenscheid, Deutschland.

出版信息

Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2024 Dec;35(4):256-262. doi: 10.1007/s00399-024-01054-6. Epub 2024 Nov 18.

Abstract

Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) is an effective method for increasing quality of life and life expectancy for many patients with heart failure. Due to the good results, this procedure is used frequently in Germany and has established itself as a class I indication in heart failure therapy. In addition to His bundle pacing, left bundle branch pacing has now also made a name for itself, as it shows a good success rate and can be used in a wider range of patients. Now the question arises as to whether left bundle branch pacing is superior to classic biventricular pacing and what the evidence situation is in this respect. This question shall be discussed in this article considering current studies and guideline recommendations.

摘要

心脏再同步治疗(CRT)是提高许多心力衰竭患者生活质量和延长预期寿命的有效方法。由于效果良好,该手术在德国经常使用,并已成为心力衰竭治疗中的I类适应症。除了希氏束起搏外,左束支起搏现在也已声名远扬,因为它显示出较高的成功率,并且可用于更广泛的患者群体。现在出现了一个问题,即左束支起搏是否优于传统双心室起搏,以及在这方面的证据情况如何。本文将结合当前研究和指南建议对这个问题进行讨论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验