轻度镇静机械通气重症监护患者的谵妄持续时间与死亡率。
Delirium duration and mortality in lightly sedated, mechanically ventilated intensive care patients.
机构信息
University of New South Wales Clinical School, The Prince of Wales Hospital Campus, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
出版信息
Crit Care Med. 2010 Dec;38(12):2311-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181f85759.
OBJECTIVES
To determine the relationship between the number of delirium days experienced by intensive care patients and mortality, ventilation time, and intensive care unit stay.
DESIGN
Prospective cohort analysis.
SETTING
Patients from 68 intensive care units in five countries.
PATIENTS
Three hundred fifty-four medical and surgical intensive care patients enrolled in the SEDCOM (Safety and Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine Compared with Midazolam) trial received a sedative study drug and completed at least one delirium assessment.
INTERVENTIONS
Sedative drug interruption and/or titration to maintain light sedation with daily arousal and delirium assessments up to 30 days of mechanical ventilation.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS
The primary outcome was all-cause 30-day mortality. Multivariable analysis using Cox regression incorporating delirium duration as a time-dependent variable and adjusting for eight relevant baseline covariates was conducted to quantify the relationship between number of delirium days and the three main outcomes. Overall, delirium was diagnosed in 228 of 354 patients (64.4%). Mortality was significantly lower in patients without delirium compared to those with delirium (15 of 126 [11.9%] vs. 69 of 228 [30.3%]; p<.001). Similarly, the median time to extubation and intensive care unit discharge were significantly shorter among nondelirious patients (3.6 vs. 10.7 days [p<.001] and 4 vs. 16 days [p<.001], respectively). In multivariable analysis, the duration of delirium exhibited a nonlinear relationship with mortality (p=.02), with the strongest association observed in the early days of delirium. In comparison to 0 days of delirium, an independent dose-response increase in mortality was observed, which increased from 1 day of delirium (hazard ratio, 1.70; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-2.29; p<.001), 2 days of delirium (hazard ratio, 2.69; confidence interval, 1.58-4.57; p<.001), and ≥3 days of delirium (hazard ratio, 3.37; confidence interval, 1.92-7.23; p<.001). Similar independent relationships were observed between delirium duration and ventilation time and intensive care length of stay.
CONCLUSIONS
In ventilated and lightly sedated intensive care unit patients, the duration of delirium was the strongest independent predictor of death, ventilation time, and intensive care unit stay after adjusting for relevant covariates.
目的
确定 ICU 患者经历的谵妄天数与死亡率、通气时间和 ICU 住院时间之间的关系。
设计
前瞻性队列分析。
地点
来自五个国家的 68 个 ICU 的患者。
患者
354 名接受镇静研究药物的内科和外科 ICU 患者,并完成了至少一次谵妄评估,参加了 SEDCOM(右美托咪定与咪达唑仑的安全性和疗效)试验。
干预措施
镇静药物中断和/或滴定,以维持轻度镇静,每天唤醒并评估谵妄,持续 30 天机械通气。
测量和主要结果
主要结局为全因 30 天死亡率。使用 Cox 回归分析,纳入谵妄持续时间作为时间依赖性变量,并调整了 8 个相关基线协变量,以量化谵妄天数与三个主要结局之间的关系。总体而言,354 名患者中有 228 名(64.4%)被诊断为谵妄。与无谵妄患者相比,谵妄患者的死亡率显著降低(126 例中有 15 例[11.9%],228 例中有 69 例[30.3%];p<.001)。同样,无谵妄患者的中位拔管和 ICU 出院时间明显缩短(3.6 天 vs. 10.7 天[p<.001]和 4 天 vs. 16 天[p<.001])。在多变量分析中,谵妄的持续时间与死亡率呈非线性关系(p=.02),在谵妄的早期观察到最强的关联。与无谵妄 0 天相比,死亡率观察到独立的剂量反应增加,从谵妄 1 天(危险比,1.70;95%置信区间,1.27-2.29;p<.001)、2 天(危险比,2.69;置信区间,1.58-4.57;p<.001)和≥3 天(危险比,3.37;置信区间,1.92-7.23;p<.001)增加。在谵妄持续时间与通气时间和 ICU 住院时间之间也观察到类似的独立关系。
结论
在接受机械通气和轻度镇静治疗的 ICU 患者中,在调整相关协变量后,谵妄持续时间是死亡、通气时间和 ICU 住院时间的最强独立预测因素。