Pandharipande Pratik P, Pun Brenda T, Herr Daniel L, Maze Mervyn, Girard Timothy D, Miller Russell R, Shintani Ayumi K, Thompson Jennifer L, Jackson James C, Deppen Stephen A, Stiles Renee A, Dittus Robert S, Bernard Gordon R, Ely E Wesley
Department of Anesthesiology/Division of Critical Care, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
JAMA. 2007 Dec 12;298(22):2644-53. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.22.2644.
Lorazepam is currently recommended for sustained sedation of mechanically ventilated intensive care unit (ICU) patients, but this and other benzodiazepine drugs may contribute to acute brain dysfunction, ie, delirium and coma, associated with prolonged hospital stays, costs, and increased mortality. Dexmedetomidine induces sedation via different central nervous system receptors than the benzodiazepine drugs and may lower the risk of acute brain dysfunction.
To determine whether dexmedetomidine reduces the duration of delirium and coma in mechanically ventilated ICU patients while providing adequate sedation as compared with lorazepam.
DESIGN, SETTING, PATIENTS, AND INTERVENTION: Double-blind, randomized controlled trial of 106 adult mechanically ventilated medical and surgical ICU patients at 2 tertiary care centers between August 2004 and April 2006. Patients were sedated with dexmedetomidine or lorazepam for as many as 120 hours. Study drugs were titrated to achieve the desired level of sedation, measured using the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS). Patients were monitored twice daily for delirium using the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU).
Days alive without delirium or coma and percentage of days spent within 1 RASS point of the sedation goal.
Sedation with dexmedetomidine resulted in more days alive without delirium or coma (median days, 7.0 vs 3.0; P = .01) and a lower prevalence of coma (63% vs 92%; P < .001) than sedation with lorazepam. Patients sedated with dexmedetomidine spent more time within 1 RASS point of their sedation goal compared with patients sedated with lorazepam (median percentage of days, 80% vs 67%; P = .04). The 28-day mortality in the dexmedetomidine group was 17% vs 27% in the lorazepam group (P = .18) and cost of care was similar between groups. More patients in the dexmedetomidine group (42% vs 31%; P = .61) were able to complete post-ICU neuropsychological testing, with similar scores in the tests evaluating global cognitive, motor speed, and attention functions. The 12-month time to death was 363 days in the dexmedetomidine group vs 188 days in the lorazepam group (P = .48).
In mechanically ventilated ICU patients managed with individualized targeted sedation, use of a dexmedetomidine infusion resulted in more days alive without delirium or coma and more time at the targeted level of sedation than with a lorazepam infusion.
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00095251.
目前推荐使用劳拉西泮对机械通气的重症监护病房(ICU)患者进行持续镇静,但这种药物以及其他苯二氮䓬类药物可能会导致急性脑功能障碍,即谵妄和昏迷,进而导致住院时间延长、费用增加以及死亡率上升。右美托咪定通过与苯二氮䓬类药物不同的中枢神经系统受体诱导镇静,可能会降低急性脑功能障碍的风险。
确定与劳拉西泮相比,右美托咪定在为机械通气的ICU患者提供充分镇静的同时,是否能缩短谵妄和昏迷的持续时间。
设计、地点、患者和干预措施:2004年8月至2006年4月期间,在2个三级医疗中心对106名成年机械通气的内科和外科ICU患者进行了双盲、随机对照试验。患者使用右美托咪定或劳拉西泮进行长达120小时的镇静。根据里士满躁动-镇静量表(RASS)滴定研究药物,以达到所需的镇静水平。使用ICU谵妄评估方法(CAM-ICU)每天对患者进行两次谵妄监测。
无谵妄或昏迷存活天数以及在镇静目标的1个RASS点范围内度过的天数百分比。
与使用劳拉西泮镇静相比,使用右美托咪定镇静导致无谵妄或昏迷存活天数更多(中位数天数,7.0对3.0;P = 0.01),昏迷发生率更低(63%对92%;P < 0.001)。与使用劳拉西泮镇静的患者相比,使用右美托咪定镇静的患者在其镇静目标的1个RASS点范围内度过的时间更多(天数中位数百分比,80%对67%;P = 0.04)。右美托咪定组的28天死亡率为17%,而劳拉西泮组为27%(P = 0.18),两组的护理费用相似。右美托咪定组中更多患者(42%对31%;P = 0.61)能够完成ICU后的神经心理学测试,在评估整体认知、运动速度和注意力功能的测试中得分相似。右美托咪定组的12个月死亡时间为363天,而劳拉西泮组为188天(P = 0.48)。
在采用个体化目标镇静管理的机械通气ICU患者中,与输注劳拉西泮相比,输注右美托咪定可使无谵妄或昏迷存活天数更多,且在目标镇静水平的时间更长。
clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT00095251。