Suppr超能文献

在重症监护病房中,快速可逆性镇静相关谵妄与持续性谵妄。

Rapidly reversible, sedation-related delirium versus persistent delirium in the intensive care unit.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.

出版信息

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Mar 15;189(6):658-65. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201310-1815OC.

Abstract

RATIONALE

Intensive care unit (ICU) delirium is associated with ventilator, ICU, and hospital days; discharge functional status; and mortality. Whether rapidly reversible, sedation-related delirium (delirium that abates shortly after sedative interruption) occurs with the same frequency and portends the same prognosis as persistent delirium (delirium that persists despite a short period of sedative interruption) is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To compare rapidly reversible, sedation-related delirium and persistent delirium.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study of 102 adult, intubated medical ICU subjects in a tertiary care teaching hospital. Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU evaluation was performed before and after daily interruption of continuous sedation (DIS). Investigators were blinded to each other's assessments and as to whether evaluations were before or after DIS. The primary outcome was proportion of days with no delirium versus rapidly reversible, sedation-related delirium versus persistent delirium. Secondary outcomes were ventilator, ICU, and hospital days; discharge disposition; and 1-year mortality.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The median proportion of ICU days with delirium was 0.57 before versus 0.50 after DIS (P < 0.001). The Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU indicated patients are 10.5 times more likely to have delirium before DIS versus after (P < 0.001). Rapidly reversible, sedation-related delirium showed fewer ventilator (P < 0.001), ICU (P = 0.001), and hospital days (P < 0.001) than persistent delirium. Subjects with no delirium and rapidly reversible, sedation-related delirium were more likely to be discharged home (P < 0.001). Patients with persistent delirium had increased 1-year mortality versus those with no delirium and rapidly reversible, sedation-related delirium (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Rapidly reversible, sedation-related delirium does not signify the same poor prognosis as persistent delirium. Degree of sedation should be considered in delirium assessments. Coordinating delirium assessments with daily sedative interruption will improve such assessments' ability to prognosticate ICU delirium outcomes. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 00919698).

摘要

背景

重症加强护理病房(ICU)谵妄与呼吸机使用、入住 ICU 时间、住院时间、出院时的功能状态和死亡率有关。镇静相关的谵妄(镇静中断后很快缓解的谵妄)是否与持续性谵妄(镇静中断后仍持续存在的谵妄)发生频率相同,预后是否相同尚不清楚。

目的

比较快速可逆性、镇静相关谵妄和持续性谵妄。

方法

这是一项在一家三级教学医院对 102 名成年、气管插管的内科 ICU 患者进行的前瞻性队列研究。在每日中断连续镇静(DIS)前后使用 ICU 意识模糊评估法(CAM-ICU)进行评估。评估者彼此之间以及评估前后是否为 DIS 均不知情。主要结局为无谵妄、快速可逆性镇静相关谵妄和持续性谵妄的天数比例。次要结局为呼吸机使用、入住 ICU 时间、住院时间、出院去向和 1 年死亡率。

测量和主要结果

在 DIS 前,ICU 天数中有谵妄的中位数为 0.57,而 DIS 后为 0.50(P<0.001)。CAM-ICU 表明,在 DIS 前,患者发生谵妄的可能性是 DIS 后的 10.5 倍(P<0.001)。快速可逆性镇静相关谵妄与持续性谵妄相比,呼吸机使用(P<0.001)、入住 ICU 时间(P=0.001)和住院时间(P<0.001)均更少。无谵妄和快速可逆性镇静相关谵妄的患者更有可能出院回家(P<0.001)。持续性谵妄患者的 1 年死亡率高于无谵妄和快速可逆性镇静相关谵妄患者(P<0.001)。

结论

快速可逆性镇静相关谵妄与持续性谵妄的预后不良并不相同。在评估谵妄时应考虑镇静程度。将谵妄评估与每日镇静中断相协调,将提高其预测 ICU 谵妄结局的能力。该研究已在 www.clinicaltrials.gov 注册(NCT 00919698)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验