Department of Psychopharmacology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India.
Indian J Psychiatry. 2010 Apr;52(2):187-90. doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.64594.
The Indian Journal of Psychiatry receives many reports which, despite obvious academic worth, are too poorly written to be publishable. Such submissions tax manuscript reviewers and increase the editorial office workload without benefiting the authors with a publication.
We describe an authentic and previously unpublished case of idiopathic leucopenia and psychosis. Leucocyte levels in this patient dropped upon challenge with different atypical antipsychotic drugs. Lithium pretreatment, however, permitted the safe and successful use of trifluperazine. Readers are invited to use a roughly-prepared version of the case report to draft a submission-worthy manuscript.
Two versions of the manuscript are presented. The first version is generally satisfactory but will trigger several queries during peer review; these queries are indicated. The second version would be considered acceptable by most reviewers.
Readers who work through the exercise provided in this article will better understand how authors should prepare their report and how reviewers may scrutinize their manuscript.
《印度精神病学杂志》收到了许多报告,尽管具有明显的学术价值,但由于写作质量太差而无法发表。这些投稿增加了稿件评审人的工作量,使编辑部的工作负担加重,却没有让作者获得发表机会。
我们描述了一个真实的、以前未发表过的特发性白细胞减少症和精神病病例。该患者的白细胞水平在接受不同的非典型抗精神病药物治疗后下降。然而,锂预处理允许安全有效地使用三氟拉嗪。我们邀请读者使用该病例报告的大致草稿来撰写一篇有投稿价值的手稿。
呈现了两份版本的手稿。第一份版本总体上令人满意,但在同行评审期间会引发几个问题;这些问题已指出。第二份版本将被大多数评审人认为是可接受的。
通过本文提供的练习,读者将更好地理解作者应该如何准备报告,以及评审人可能会如何仔细审查他们的手稿。