Suppr超能文献

对比心肺转流手术患者中使用新鲜冷冻血浆和凝血酶原复合物浓缩物逆转口服抗凝剂的效果:一项随机研究。

Comparison of fresh frozen plasma and prothrombin complex concentrate for the reversal of oral anticoagulants in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery: a randomized study.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Vox Sang. 2010 Oct;99(3):251-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2010.01339.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and prothrombin complex concentrates (PCC) reverse oral anticoagulants. We compared PCC and FFP intraoperative administration in patients undergoing heart surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).

METHODS

Forty patients [with international normalized ratio (INR)≥ 2·1] assigned semi-urgent cardiac surgery were randomized to receive either FFP (n = 20) or PCC (n = 20). Prior to CPB, they received either 2 units of FFP or half of the PCC dose calculated according to body weight, initial INR and target INR ( ≤ 1·5). After CPB and protamine administration, patients received either another 2 units of FFP or the other half PCC dose. Additional doses were administered if INR was still too high ( ≥ 1·5).

RESULTS

Fifteen minutes after CPB, more patients reached INR target with PCC (P = 0·007): 7/16 patients vs. 0/15 patients with FFP; there was no difference 1 h after CPB (6/15 patients with PCC vs. 4/15 patients with FFP reached target). Fifteen minutes after CPB, median INR (range) decreased to 1·6 (1·2-2·2) with PCC vs. 2·3 (1·5-3·5) with FFP; 1 h after CPB both groups reached similar values [1·6 (1·3-2·2) with PCC and 1·7 (1·3-2·7) with FFP]. With PCC, less patients needed additional dose (6/20) than with FFP (20/20) (P < 0·001). Both groups differed significantly on the course of factor II (P = 0·0023) and factor X (P = 0·008) over time. Dilution of coagulation factors was maximal at CPB onset. Safety was good for both groups, with only two related oozing cases with FFP.

CONCLUSION

PCC reverses anticoagulation safely, faster and with less bleeding than FFP.

摘要

背景

新鲜冷冻血浆(FFP)和凝血酶原复合物浓缩物(PCC)可逆转口服抗凝剂的作用。我们比较了在接受体外循环(CPB)心脏手术的患者中术中给予 PCC 和 FFP 的效果。

方法

40 名[INR≥2.1]接受半紧急心脏手术的患者被随机分为接受 FFP(n=20)或 PCC(n=20)组。在 CPB 之前,他们分别接受了 2 单位 FFP 或根据体重、初始 INR 和目标 INR(≤1.5)计算的 PCC 剂量的一半。CPB 和鱼精蛋白后,患者接受了另外 2 单位 FFP 或 PCC 剂量的另一半。如果 INR 仍然过高(≥1.5),则给予额外剂量。

结果

CPB 后 15 分钟,更多患者的 INR 达到目标值,用 PCC 的患者(P=0.007):7/16 例患者 vs. 0/15 例用 FFP 的患者;CPB 后 1 小时则没有差异(6/15 例用 PCC 的患者 vs. 4/15 例用 FFP 的患者达到目标)。CPB 后 15 分钟,中位数 INR(范围)降至 1.6(1.2-2.2),用 PCC 组 vs. 2.3(1.5-3.5),用 FFP 组;CPB 后 1 小时,两组均达到相似的值[1.6(1.3-2.2),用 PCC;1.7(1.3-2.7),用 FFP]。用 PCC 的患者中,需要额外剂量的患者(6/20)少于用 FFP 的患者(20/20)(P<0.001)。两组在凝血因子 II(P=0.0023)和 X(P=0.008)随时间的变化方面差异显著。在 CPB 开始时,凝血因子的稀释达到最大值。两组的安全性均良好,仅在 FFP 中出现 2 例相关的渗血病例。

结论

PCC 比 FFP 更安全、更快、出血更少地逆转抗凝作用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验