Suppr超能文献

麻醉方式对快速通道腹式子宫切除术术后恢复的影响:一项随机临床试验。

The impact of mode of anaesthesia on postoperative recovery from fast-track abdominal hysterectomy: a randomised clinical trial.

机构信息

Division of Women and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping, Sweden.

出版信息

BJOG. 2011 Feb;118(3):299-308. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02697.x. Epub 2010 Sep 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

to determine whether the duration of hospital stay after abdominal hysterectomy in a fast-track setting differed between women operated under general anaesthesia or in spinal anaesthesia with intrathecal morphine.

DESIGN

an open randomised controlled multicentre study.

SETTING

five hospitals in the south-east of Sweden.

POPULATION

one hundred and eighty women scheduled for benign hysterectomy were randomised: 162 completed the study, 82 were allocated to spinal anaesthesia and 80 were allocated to general anaesthesia.

METHODS

fast-track model comprising no use of sedatives for premedication, pre-emptive anti-emetic therapy, intravenous fluid restriction, analgesics based on non-opioids, early enteral nutrition and mobilisation, and standard criteria for discharge. Spinal anaesthesia with 20 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine and 0.2 mg morphine. General anaesthesia with propofol, fentanyl and rocuronium, and with continuous propofol and ventilation with oxygen-in-air for maintenance of anaesthesia.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

hospital stay, consumption of analgesics, vomiting, pruritus and bowel function recovery.

RESULTS

median hospitalisation did not differ significantly between women who had hysterectomy with spinal or general anaesthesia (46 and 50 hours, respectively). Spinal anaesthesia was associated with a significantly lower use of opioids and a faster recovery of bowel function, although vomiting and pruritus were more prevalent.

CONCLUSIONS

in a fast-track model the duration of hospitalisation after abdominal hysterectomy was < 50 hours, independent of the mode of anaesthesia. Spinal anaesthesia reduced the need for postoperative morphine compared with general anaesthesia. In order to improve patient recovery after gynaecological surgery further studies based on fast-track programmes are needed.

摘要

目的

比较全身麻醉与蛛网膜下腔麻醉联合鞘内吗啡用于快速通道腹部子宫切除术的患者的住院时间。

设计

开放随机对照多中心研究。

地点

瑞典东南部的 5 家医院。

人群

180 名择期行良性子宫切除术的女性患者被随机分组:162 名完成了研究,82 名接受蛛网膜下腔麻醉,80 名接受全身麻醉。

方法

快速通道模式包括不使用镇静剂进行术前用药、预防性止吐治疗、静脉输液限制、基于非阿片类药物的镇痛、早期肠内营养和活动、以及标准出院标准。蛛网膜下腔麻醉采用 20 mg 重比重布比卡因和 0.2 mg 吗啡。全身麻醉采用丙泊酚、芬太尼和罗库溴铵,并采用持续输注丙泊酚和空气氧通气维持麻醉。

主要观察指标

住院时间、镇痛药消耗、呕吐、瘙痒和肠道功能恢复情况。

结果

接受蛛网膜下腔麻醉和全身麻醉的患者的中位住院时间无显著差异(分别为 46 小时和 50 小时)。蛛网膜下腔麻醉与较低的阿片类药物使用量和更快的肠道功能恢复相关,但呕吐和瘙痒更为常见。

结论

在快速通道模式下,腹部子宫切除术后的住院时间<50 小时,与麻醉方式无关。与全身麻醉相比,蛛网膜下腔麻醉减少了术后吗啡的需求。为了进一步改善妇科手术后患者的恢复,需要进一步开展基于快速通道方案的研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验