Shah P K, Lakhotia M, Chittora M, Mehta S, Mehta S, Vyas R, Parihar M
Department of Internal Medicine, Dr SN Medical College Hospital, Jodhpur.
J Assoc Physicians India. 1990 Oct;38(10):781-4.
Thirty eight patients with essential hypertension and 20 healthy volunteers were subjected to treadmill exercise test. The hypertensives were then controlled with atenolol or captopril by randomly forming two groups of 19 patients each, and treadmill evaluation was repeated. The resting rate-pressure product (RPP) and myocardial oxygen consumption (MVO2), as well as peak RPP and MVO2 and recovery time, were increased and exercise duration decreased significantly in uncontrolled hypertensives (p less than 0.001). Control of hypertension resulted in significant improvement of exercise performance in both the groups. Atenolol, when compared to captopril, resulted in better exercise conditioning with considerable lowering of resting and peak RPP and MVO2 (p less than 0.001), though the difference in exercise duration, maximum work load and recovery time were not significant (p greater than 0.05). Thus, where myocardial oxygen consumption is an important consideration while treating hypertension, atenolol offers a better choice.
38例原发性高血压患者和20名健康志愿者接受了平板运动试验。然后将高血压患者随机分为两组,每组19例,分别用阿替洛尔或卡托普利进行治疗,并再次进行平板运动评估。未控制的高血压患者静息心率-血压乘积(RPP)和心肌耗氧量(MVO2)以及峰值RPP和MVO2及恢复时间增加,运动持续时间显著缩短(p<0.001)。高血压得到控制后,两组的运动表现均有显著改善。与卡托普利相比,阿替洛尔能更好地改善运动状态,使静息和峰值RPP及MVO2显著降低(p<0.001),尽管运动持续时间、最大工作量和恢复时间的差异不显著(p>0.05)。因此,在治疗高血压时,若心肌耗氧量是一个重要考虑因素,阿替洛尔是更好的选择。