• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于人群的慢性疼痛队列研究:阿片类药物的作用。

A population-based cohort study on chronic pain: the role of opioids.

机构信息

Section of Acute Pain Management and Palliative Medicine, Rigshospitalet, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Clin J Pain. 2010 Nov-Dec;26(9):763-9. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181f15daf.

DOI:10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181f15daf
PMID:20842015
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were 2-fold: (1) to investigate the consequences of opioid use in individuals with chronic pain in the Danish population, and (2) to investigate the development of and recovery from chronic pain from 2000 to 2005.

METHODS

Data derived from the Danish Health Interview Survey in 2000, which were linked on the individual level with register-based follow-up data. The survey was based on a county-stratified random sample of 16,684 individuals, out of which 10,434 individuals (62.5%) completed a face-to-face interview and returned a self-administered questionnaire. In addition, a subsample of the sample in 2000 was reinvited to a follow-up survey in 2005. In total, 3649 individuals (61.7%) of this subsample completed the interview and returned the questionnaire at baseline in 2000. At follow-up, 2354 of these participants completed the interview and returned the self-administered questionnaire. Respondents with cancer diagnosis were excluded from all analyses. Respondents with chronic pain were identified as having chronic/long-lasting pain more than 6 months.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The annual incidence for the development of and the recovery from chronic pain was 2.7% and 9.4%, respectively. Increasing age up to 64 years, short education, poor self-rated health, high body mass index, and physical strain at work were predictors of chronic pain. The odds of recovery from chronic pain were almost 4 times higher among individuals not using opioids compared with individuals using opioids. In addition, use of strong opioids was associated with poor health-related quality of life. Furthermore, the results indicated that individuals with chronic pain using strong opioids pain had a higher risk of death than individuals without chronic pain (HR: 1.67; 95% CI: 1.03-2.70). However, this study cannot exclude disease severity as the primary cause of increased mortality.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在从以下两个方面对丹麦人群慢性疼痛患者使用阿片类药物的后果进行探讨:(1)研究慢性疼痛患者使用阿片类药物的后果;(2)从 2000 年至 2005 年,调查慢性疼痛的发生和康复情况。

方法

本研究的数据来源于丹麦健康访谈调查(2000 年),该调查基于县分层随机样本,共抽取了 16684 名个体,其中 10434 人(62.5%)完成了面对面访谈,并提交了自我管理问卷。此外,该样本的子样本还邀请参加了 2005 年的随访调查。该子样本共有 3649 人(61.7%)完成了 2000 年的访谈和问卷调查。在随访中,其中 2354 人完成了访谈和问卷调查。所有分析均排除了癌症诊断患者。慢性疼痛患者被定义为患有持续/长期疼痛超过 6 个月的患者。

结果与讨论

慢性疼痛的发生和康复的年发生率分别为 2.7%和 9.4%。年龄在 64 岁以下、受教育程度低、自我健康评价差、体重指数高、工作中身体劳损是慢性疼痛的预测因素。与使用阿片类药物的患者相比,不使用阿片类药物的患者从慢性疼痛中康复的几率几乎高出 4 倍。此外,使用强阿片类药物与较差的健康相关生活质量相关。此外,结果表明,使用强阿片类药物治疗慢性疼痛的患者比没有慢性疼痛的患者死亡风险更高(HR:1.67;95%CI:1.03-2.70)。然而,本研究不能排除疾病严重程度是导致死亡率增加的主要原因。

相似文献

1
A population-based cohort study on chronic pain: the role of opioids.基于人群的慢性疼痛队列研究:阿片类药物的作用。
Clin J Pain. 2010 Nov-Dec;26(9):763-9. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181f15daf.
2
Alcohol and smoking behavior in chronic pain patients: the role of opioids.慢性疼痛患者的饮酒与吸烟行为:阿片类药物的作用
Eur J Pain. 2009 Jul;13(6):606-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2008.07.006. Epub 2008 Sep 5.
3
Opioids and the management of chronic severe pain in the elderly: consensus statement of an International Expert Panel with focus on the six clinically most often used World Health Organization Step III opioids (buprenorphine, fentanyl, hydromorphone, methadone, morphine, oxycodone).阿片类药物与老年人慢性重度疼痛的管理:一个国际专家小组的共识声明,重点关注世界卫生组织第三阶梯临床最常用的六种阿片类药物(丁丙诺啡、芬太尼、氢吗啡酮、美沙酮、吗啡、羟考酮)。
Pain Pract. 2008 Jul-Aug;8(4):287-313. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2008.00204.x. Epub 2008 May 23.
4
Development of and recovery from long-term pain. A 6-year follow-up study of a cross-section of the adult Danish population.长期疼痛的发展与康复。对丹麦成年人群横断面的一项6年随访研究。
Pain. 2004 Mar;108(1-2):154-62. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2003.12.018.
5
Critical issues on opioids in chronic non-cancer pain: an epidemiological study.慢性非癌性疼痛中阿片类药物的关键问题:一项流行病学研究。
Pain. 2006 Nov;125(1-2):172-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.06.009. Epub 2006 Jul 13.
6
Longitudinal treatment outcomes for geriatric patients with chronic non-cancer pain at an interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation program.老年慢性非癌痛患者在跨学科疼痛康复项目中的纵向治疗结果。
Pain Med. 2010 Sep;11(9):1352-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00937.x. Epub 2010 Aug 23.
7
10-year follow-up of chronic non-malignant pain patients: opioid use, health related quality of life and health care utilization.慢性非恶性疼痛患者的10年随访:阿片类药物使用、健康相关生活质量和医疗保健利用情况
Eur J Pain. 2006 Jul;10(5):423-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.06.001. Epub 2005 Jul 28.
8
Ongoing pain despite aggressive opioid pain management among persons with HIV.尽管对 HIV 感染者进行了积极的阿片类药物疼痛管理,但仍持续存在疼痛。
Clin J Pain. 2010 Mar-Apr;26(3):190-8. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181b91624.
9
Intrathecal opioid therapy for chronic nonmalignant pain: a retrospective cohort study with 3-year follow-up.鞘内阿片类药物治疗慢性非恶性疼痛:一项具有 3 年随访的回顾性队列研究。
Pain Med. 2010 Jul;11(7):1010-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00876.x. Epub 2010 May 18.
10
Benzodiazepines predict use of opioids--a follow-up study of 17,074 men and women.苯二氮䓬类药物可预测阿片类药物的使用——对 17074 名男性和女性的随访研究。
Pain Med. 2010 Jun;11(6):805-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00870.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Incorporating Patient and Provider Voices into the Veterans Pain Care Organizational Improvement Comparative Effectiveness Study: Informing Future Implementation.将患者和医疗服务提供者的意见纳入退伍军人疼痛护理组织改进比较效果研究:为未来的实施提供信息。
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Jun 6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09639-8.
2
What Makes for a Positive Patient Experience in Chronic Pain Care? A Qualitative Evaluation of Factors Affecting Veteran Patient Satisfaction Across Two Individualized Pain Care Interventions in VA Primary Care.在慢性疼痛护理中,怎样才能带来积极的患者体验?对影响退伍军人患者在退伍军人事务部初级护理中两种个性化疼痛护理干预措施满意度的因素进行定性评估。
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 May 27. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09630-3.
3
Care Models to Improve Pain and Reduce Opioids Among Patients Prescribed Long-Term Opioid Therapy: The VOICE Randomized Clinical Trial.
改善长期接受阿片类药物治疗患者的疼痛并减少阿片类药物使用的护理模式:VOICE随机临床试验
JAMA Intern Med. 2025 Feb 1;185(2):208-220. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.6683.
4
Correlates of chronic pain onset and recovery in the CoLaus cohort.科劳什队列中慢性疼痛发作与恢复的相关因素。
Eur J Pain. 2025 Feb;29(2):e4712. doi: 10.1002/ejp.4712. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
5
The impact of opioid versus non-opioid analgesics on postoperative pain level, quality of life, and outcomes in ventral hernia repair.阿片类药物与非阿片类药物镇痛对腹疝修补术后疼痛水平、生活质量和结局的影响。
Hernia. 2024 Oct;28(5):1599-1607. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-02968-3. Epub 2024 Jan 31.
6
Taking the pain out of pain.消除疼痛之痛。
Br J Pain. 2023 Dec;17(6):514-518. doi: 10.1177/20494637231208167. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
7
Reducing opioid use for chronic non-cancer pain in primary care using an evidence-based, theory-informed, multistrategic, multistakeholder approach: a single-arm time series with segmented regression.采用基于证据、理论驱动、多策略、多利益相关者方法减少初级保健中慢性非癌痛的阿片类药物使用:单臂时间序列与分段回归。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2023 Nov;32(11):623-631. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015716. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
8
Opioid prescribing and social deprivation: A retrospective analysis of prescribing for CNCP in Liverpool CCG.阿片类药物处方与社会剥夺:利物浦 CCG 中针对慢性非癌性疼痛的处方回顾性分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 8;18(3):e0280958. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280958. eCollection 2023.
9
Feasibility study of a Behavioural Intervention for Opioid Reduction (BIOR) for patients with chronic non-cancer pain in primary care: a protocol.在初级保健中对慢性非癌性疼痛患者进行行为干预减少阿片类药物使用(BIOR)的可行性研究:方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jan 18;13(1):e065646. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065646.
10
Patterns of prescribing in primary care leading to high-dose opioid regimens: a mixed-method study.基层医疗中导致高剂量阿片类药物治疗方案的处方模式:一项混合方法研究。
BJGP Open. 2022 Dec 20;6(4). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0134. Print 2022 Dec.