Krebs Erin E, Becker William C, Nelson David B, DeRonne Beth M, Jensen Agnes C, Kats Allyson M, Morasco Benjamin J, Frank Joseph W, Makris Una E, Allen Kelli D, Naylor Jennifer C, Mixon Amanda S, Bohnert Amy, Reznik Thomas E, Painter Jacob T, Hudson Teresa J, Hagedorn Hildi J, Manuel Jennifer K, Borsari Brian, Purcell Natalie, Hammett Patrick, Amundson Erin C, Kerns Robert D, Barbosa Monica R, Garvey Caitlin, Jones Elzie J, Noh Maureen Y, Okere Jennifer B, Bhushan Sujata, Pinsonnault John, Williams Beth E, Herbst Ellen, Lagisetty Pooja, Librodo Sara, Mapara Payal S, Son Elizabeth, Tat Christina, Marraffa Rebecca A, Seys Randy L, Baxley Catherine, Seal Karen H
Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis.
JAMA Intern Med. 2025 Feb 1;185(2):208-220. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.6683.
Patients prescribed long-term opioid therapy for chronic pain often experience unrelieved pain, poor quality of life, and serious adverse events.
To compare the effects of integrated pain team (IPT) vs pharmacist collaborative management (PCM) on pain and opioid dosage.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This study was a pragmatic multisite 12-month randomized comparative effectiveness trial with masked outcome assessment. Patients were recruited from October 2017 to March 2021; follow-up was completed June 2022. The study sites were Veterans Affairs primary care clinics. Eligible patients had moderate to severe chronic pain despite long-term opioid therapy (≥20 mg/d for at least 3 months).
IPT involved interdisciplinary pain care planning, visits throughout 12 months with medical and mental health clinicians, and emphasis on nondrug therapies and motivational interviewing. PCM was a collaborative care intervention involving visits throughout 12 months with a clinical pharmacist care manager who conducted structured monitoring and medication optimization. Both interventions provided individualized pain care and opioid tapering recommendations to patients.
The primary outcome was pain response (≥30% decrease in Brief Pain Inventory total score) at 12 months. The main secondary outcome was 50% or greater reduction in opioid daily dosage at 12 months.
A total of 820 patients were randomized to IPT (n = 411) or PCM (n = 409). Participants' mean (SD) age was 62.2 (10.6) years, and 709 (86.5%) were male. A pain response was achieved in 58/350 patients in the IPT group (16.4%) vs 54/362 patients in the PCM group (14.9%) (odds ratio, 1.11 [95% CI, 0.74-1.67]; P = .61). A 50% opioid dose reduction was achieved in 102/403 patients in the IPT group (25.3%) vs 98/399 patients in the PCM group (24.6%) (odds ratio, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.75-1.42]; P = .85). Over 12 months, the mean (SD) Brief Pain Inventory total score improved from 6.7 (1.5) points to 6.1 (1.8) points (P < .001) in IPT and from 6.6 (1.6) points to 6.0 (1.9) points (P < .001) in PCM (between-group P = .82). Over 12 months, mean (SD) opioid daily dosage decreased from 80.8 (74.2) mg/d to 54.2 (65.0) mg/d in IPT (P < .001) and from 74.5 (56.9) mg/d to 52.8 (51.9) mg/d (P < .001) in PCM (between-group P = .22).
Outcomes in this randomized clinical trial did not differ between groups; both had small improvements in pain and substantial reductions in opioid dosage.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03026790.
接受长期阿片类药物治疗慢性疼痛的患者常常经历疼痛未缓解、生活质量差以及严重不良事件。
比较综合疼痛团队(IPT)与药剂师协作管理(PCM)对疼痛和阿片类药物剂量的影响。
设计、设置和参与者:本研究是一项实用的多中心12个月随机对照有效性试验,采用盲法评估结果。患者于2017年10月至2021年3月招募;随访于2022年6月完成。研究地点为退伍军人事务初级保健诊所。符合条件的患者尽管接受了长期阿片类药物治疗(至少3个月,≥20毫克/天),仍有中度至重度慢性疼痛。
IPT包括跨学科疼痛护理规划、在12个月内与医学和心理健康临床医生进行就诊,并强调非药物治疗和动机访谈。PCM是一种协作护理干预措施,包括在12个月内与临床药剂师护理经理进行就诊,该经理进行结构化监测和药物优化。两种干预措施都为患者提供个性化疼痛护理和阿片类药物减量建议。
主要结局是12个月时的疼痛反应(简明疼痛量表总分降低≥30%)。主要次要结局是12个月时阿片类药物每日剂量减少50%或更多。
共有820名患者被随机分配到IPT组(n = 411)或PCM组(n = 409)。参与者的平均(标准差)年龄为62.2(10.6)岁,709名(86.5%)为男性。IPT组350名患者中有58名(16.4%)实现了疼痛反应,而PCM组362名患者中有54名(14.9%)实现了疼痛反应(优势比,1.11 [95%置信区间,0.74 - 1.67];P = 0.61)。IPT组403名患者中有102名(25.3%)实现了阿片类药物剂量减少50%,而PCM组399名患者中有98名(24.6%)实现了阿片类药物剂量减少50%(优势比,1.03 [95%置信区间,0.75 - 1.42];P = 0.85)。在12个月期间,IPT组简明疼痛量表总分平均(标准差)从6.7(1.5)分改善至6.1(1.8)分(P < 0.001),PCM组从6.6(1.6)分改善至6.0(1.9)分(P < 0.001)(组间P = 0.82)。在12个月期间,IPT组阿片类药物每日平均(标准差)剂量从80.8(74.2)毫克/天降至54.2(65.0)毫克/天(P < 0.001),PCM组从74.5(56.9)毫克/天降至52.8(51.9)毫克/天(P < 0.001)(组间P = 0.22)。
该随机临床试验的结果在组间无差异;两组在疼痛方面均有小幅改善,阿片类药物剂量均大幅减少。
ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03026790。