Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Weill Cornell College of Medicine, New York, NY 10011, USA.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010 Dec;55(4):473-82. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181eb5ff5.
Pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions between lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) and transdermally delivered ethinyl estradiol (EE) and norelgestromin (NGMN) are unknown.
Using a standard noncompartmental PK analysis, we compared EE area under the time-concentration curve (AUC) and NGMN AUC during transdermal contraceptive patch administration in HIV-1-infected women on stable LPV/r to a control group of women not on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). In addition, EE AUC after a single dose of a combination oral contraceptive pill including EE and norethindrone was measured before patch placement and was compared with patch EE AUC in both groups. Contraceptive effects on LPV/r PKs were estimated by measuring LPV/r AUC at baseline and during week 3 of patch administration.
Eight women on LPV/r, and 24 women in the control group were enrolled. Patch EE median AUC0-168 h was 45% lower at 6010.36 pg·h·mL in those on LPV/r versus 10911.42 pg·h·mL in those on no HAART (P = 0.064). Pill EE median AUC0-48 hours was similarly 55% lower at 344.67 pg·h·mL in those on LPV/r versus 765.38 pg·h·mL in those on no HAART (P = 0.003). Patch NGMN AUC0-168 h however, was 138.39 ng·h·mL, 83% higher in the LPV/r group compared with the control AUC of 75.63 ng·h·mL (P = 0.036). After 3 weeks on the patch, LPV AUC0-8 h decreased by 19%, (P = 0.156).
Although PKs of contraceptive EE and NGMN are significantly altered with LPV/r, the contraceptive efficacy of the patch is likely to be maintained. Larger studies are indicated to fully assess contraceptive efficacy versus risks of the transdermal contraceptive patch when co-administered with protease inhibitors.
洛匹那韦/利托那韦(LPV/r)与经皮给予的乙炔雌二醇(EE)和去氧孕烯(NGMN)之间的药代动力学(PK)相互作用尚不清楚。
使用标准的非房室 PK 分析,我们比较了 HIV-1 感染妇女在稳定接受 LPV/r 治疗时经皮避孕贴给药期间 EE 的 AUC(AUC 时间浓度曲线下面积)和 NGMN AUC 与未接受高效抗逆转录病毒治疗(HAART)的对照组妇女。此外,在放置避孕贴之前,还测量了包含 EE 和炔诺酮的口服避孕药单次剂量后的 EE AUC,并将其与两组的贴剂 EE AUC 进行了比较。通过测量 LPV/r 基线和贴剂使用第 3 周的 LPV/r AUC,估计了避孕贴对 LPV/r PK 的影响。
纳入了 8 名接受 LPV/r 治疗的妇女和 24 名对照组妇女。接受 LPV/r 治疗的妇女贴剂 EE AUC0-168 h 中位数为 6010.36 pg·h·mL,比未接受 HAART 的妇女的 10911.42 pg·h·mL 低 45%(P = 0.064)。接受 LPV/r 治疗的妇女的避孕药 EE AUC0-48 h 中位数也低 55%,为 344.67 pg·h·mL,而未接受 HAART 的妇女为 765.38 pg·h·mL(P = 0.003)。然而,LPV/r 组贴剂 NGMN AUC0-168 h 中位数为 138.39 ng·h·mL,比对照组的 AUC 75.63 ng·h·mL 高 83%(P = 0.036)。贴剂使用 3 周后,LPV AUC0-8 h 下降了 19%(P = 0.156)。
尽管 LPV/r 显著改变了避孕药 EE 和 NGMN 的 PK,但避孕贴的避孕效果可能仍能维持。需要进行更大规模的研究,以充分评估与蛋白酶抑制剂联合使用时经皮避孕贴的避孕效果与风险。