Department of Urologic Sciences and Vancouver Prostate Center, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC V5Z1M9, Canada.
Nat Rev Urol. 2010 Oct;7(10):552-60. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2010.141. Epub 2010 Sep 14.
Although androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has been a cornerstone of the management of prostate cancer for more than 50 years, controversy remains regarding its optimum application. Intermittent androgen suppression (IAS) has been researched since the mid-1980s as a way of reducing the adverse effects and cost of continuous androgen suppression. With preclinical evidence suggesting a potential benefit in terms of time to androgen independence, IAS has been the focus of a number of clinical phase II and III trials. Overall, these trials suggest that IAS is neither inferior nor superior to continuous androgen suppression, with respect to time to castration resistance and cancer-specific survival, but has significant advantages in terms of adverse effects, quality of life and cost. A number of unresolved questions remain, however, including how to select patients for therapy, the optimum duration of therapy, when to restart therapy after the off cycle, and how to define progression to castration-resistant disease. Landmark randomized clinical trials comparing IAS to continuous androgen suppression are in progress and will hopefully answer many of these questions. In future, the use of second-line drugs in the off-treatment phase holds potential for delaying disease progression in men on IAS. At present, men with advanced disease who are deemed candidates for ADT should be informed of IAS as a treatment option, considered experimental from an informed consent point of view, but promising based on current evidence.
尽管雄激素剥夺疗法(ADT)已经成为前列腺癌治疗 50 多年的基石,但关于其最佳应用仍存在争议。自 20 世纪 80 年代中期以来,间歇性雄激素抑制(IAS)一直被研究作为减少连续雄激素抑制的不良反应和成本的一种方法。临床前证据表明,IAS 在雄激素非依赖性时间方面具有潜在益处,因此成为许多临床 II 期和 III 期试验的焦点。总体而言,这些试验表明,IAS 在去势抵抗时间和癌症特异性生存方面既不比连续雄激素抑制差,也不比其好,但在不良反应、生活质量和成本方面具有显著优势。然而,仍有一些悬而未决的问题,包括如何选择接受治疗的患者、治疗的最佳持续时间、在停药周期后何时重新开始治疗,以及如何定义进展为去势抵抗性疾病。目前正在进行比较 IAS 与连续雄激素抑制的里程碑式随机临床试验,希望这些试验能够回答许多这些问题。未来,在停药期间使用二线药物有可能延迟接受 IAS 治疗的男性的疾病进展。目前,被认为适合 ADT 的晚期疾病男性应被告知 IAS 是一种治疗选择,从知情同意的角度来看,这是一种实验性的治疗方法,但基于目前的证据,这是有希望的。