Suppr超能文献

洛匹那韦/利托那韦单药治疗与目前的治疗方案维持治疗 HIV-1 感染:KALESOLO 试验。

Lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy versus current treatment continuation for maintenance therapy of HIV-1 infection: the KALESOLO trial.

机构信息

Service des Maladies Infectieuses, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Faculté de Médecine Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010 Nov;65(11):2436-44. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq327. Epub 2010 Sep 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated a monotherapy maintenance regimen with lopinavir/ritonavir versus continuing current combined antiretroviral treatment (cART) in HIV patients with suppressed plasma HIV-1 RNA.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was an open-label, non-inferiority, multicentre trial in 23 sites in France. Adults were randomized if they had no history of virological failure while receiving a protease inhibitor, maintained HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL for at least 6 months and did not change cART during the last 3 months. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL at Week 48 (non-inferiority margin set at -12%) with missing data and treatment modification considered as failure. The trial has been registered in ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT00140751.

RESULTS

At Week 48, 84% (73/87) of patients in the lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy group met the primary endpoint compared with 88% (87/99) in the cART group [difference, -4.0%, lower limit of 90% two-sided confidence interval (CI) for difference, -12.4%]. In secondary analysis with success defined as plasma HIV-1 RNA <400 copies/mL, 87% (76/87) of patients in the lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy group were virologically suppressed compared with 88% (87/99) in the cART group (difference, -0.5%, lower limit of 90% two-sided CI for difference, -8.5%). If antiretroviral treatment intensification was taken into account, 91% (79/87) of patients in the lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy group met the primary endpoint compared with 88% (87/99) in the cART group (difference, +2.9%, lower limit of 90% two-sided CI for difference, -4.5%). Failures of lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy did not show acquired resistance mutations in the protease gene.

CONCLUSIONS

Lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy did not achieve non-inferiority versus cART for maintaining plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL. Nevertheless, the incidence of virological failure was low (mostly with HIV-1 RNA <400 copies/mL) and easily managed by treatment intensification.

摘要

目的

我们评估了洛匹那韦/利托那韦单药维持治疗与继续当前联合抗逆转录病毒治疗(cART)在 HIV 感染者中抑制血浆 HIV-1 RNA 的效果。

患者和方法

这是一项在法国 23 个地点进行的开放性、非劣效性、多中心试验。如果患者在接受蛋白酶抑制剂治疗时没有病毒学失败史,维持 HIV-1 RNA<50 拷贝/mL 至少 6 个月,并且在过去 3 个月内未改变 cART,则可进行随机分组。主要终点是在第 48 周时 HIV-1 RNA<50 拷贝/mL 的患者比例(缺失数据和治疗修改视为失败,设定非劣效性边界为-12%)。该试验已在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,标识符为 NCT00140751。

结果

在第 48 周时,洛匹那韦/利托那韦单药组有 84%(73/87)的患者达到主要终点,而 cART 组有 88%(87/99)[差异为-4.0%,差值下限为 90%双侧置信区间(CI)为-12.4%]。在次要分析中,将病毒学成功定义为 HIV-1 RNA<400 拷贝/mL,洛匹那韦/利托那韦单药组有 87%(76/87)的患者病毒学抑制,而 cART 组有 88%(87/99)[差异为-0.5%,差值下限为 90%双侧 CI 为-8.5%]。如果考虑到抗逆转录病毒治疗强化,洛匹那韦/利托那韦单药组有 91%(79/87)的患者达到主要终点,而 cART 组有 88%(87/99)[差异为+2.9%,差值下限为 90%双侧 CI 为-4.5%]。洛匹那韦/利托那韦单药治疗失败未显示蛋白酶基因中获得性耐药突变。

结论

洛匹那韦/利托那韦单药治疗未能达到非劣效性,不能维持血浆 HIV-1 RNA<50 拷贝/mL。然而,病毒学失败的发生率较低(主要为 HIV-1 RNA<400 拷贝/mL),且易于通过治疗强化来管理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验