Bianchi S D, Barone Monfrin S, Damilano G P, Bellocchio G
Istituto di Radiologia, Università degli Studi di Torino.
Minerva Stomatol. 1990 Nov;39(11):931-6.
It is difficult to compare levels of bone loss in periodontal disease measured by periodontal probe and X-ray and to verify them versus surgical techniques. In fact, there are relatively few published reports on the subject. To this purpose the Authors describe their personal experience using plates equipped with guide tracks and center-film boxes with personalized bites. The suitability of the two methods (probe, intraoral X-ray) to determine levels of bone loss similar to those revealed by surgical verification was assessed on the basis of an analysis of the respective bone loss in 44 sites surrounding 19 dental elements. This method, which is accurate but time-consuming, demonstrated an broadly analogous underestimate (approx. 20%) using both preoperative probe and X-ray techniques in comparison to the true level of bone loss measured during surgery.
比较通过牙周探针和X射线测量的牙周病骨质流失水平，并将其与手术技术进行验证是很困难的。事实上，关于这个主题的已发表报告相对较少。为此，作者描述了他们使用配备导轨的钢板和带有个性化咬合的中心胶片盒的个人经验。基于对19个牙体周围44个部位各自骨质流失情况的分析，评估了两种方法（探针、口腔内X射线）确定与手术验证所显示的骨质流失水平相似的能力。这种方法准确但耗时，与手术中测量的真实骨质流失水平相比，术前使用探针和X射线技术均显示出大致相似的低估情况（约20%）。
