University of California, San Francisco, Department of Medicine, and Department of Emergency Services, San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA.
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2010 Jul-Aug;25(4):309-17. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00008244.
The Medical Priority Dispatch System (MPDS) is an emergency medical dispatch system widely used to prioritize 9-1-1 calls and optimize resource allocation. This study evaluates whether the assigned priority predicts a Delphi process-derived level of prehospital intervention in each emergency medical dispatch category.
All patients given a MPDS priority in a suburban California county from 2004-2006 were included. A Delphi process of emergency medical services (EMS) professionals in another system developed the following categories of prehospital treatment representing increasing acuity, which were adapted for this study: advanced life support (ALS) intervention, ALS-Stat, and ALS-Critical. The sensitivities and specificities of MPDS priority for level of prehospital intervention were determined for each MPDS category. Likelihood ratios of low and high priority dispatch codes for the level of prehospital intervention also were calculated for each MPDS category.
A total of 65,268 patients met inclusion criteria, representing 61% of EMS calls during the study period. The overall sensitivities of high-priority dispatch codes for ALS, ALS-Stat, and ALS-Critical interventions were 83% (95% confidence interval 83-84%), 83% (82-84%), and 94% (92-96%). Overall specificities were: ALS, 32% (31-32%); ALS-Stat, 31% (30-31%); and ALS-Critical 28% (28-29%). Compared to calls assigned to a low priority, calls with high-priority dispatch codes were more likely to receive ALS interventions by 22%, ALS-Stat by 20%, and ALS-Critical by 32%. A low priority dispatch code decreased the likelihood of ALS interventions by 48%, ALS-Stat by 45%, and ALS-Critical by 80%. Among high-priority dispatch codes, the rates of interventions were: ALS 26%, ALS-Stat 22%, and ALS-Critical 1.5%, all of which were significantly greater than low-priority calls (p<0.05) [ALS 13%, ALS-Stat 11%, and ALS-Critical 0.2%]. Major MPDS were categories with high sensitivities (>95%) for ALS interventions included breathing problems, cardiac or respiratory arrest/death, chest pain, stroke, and unconscious/fainting; these categories had an average specificity of 3%. Medical Priority Dispatch System categories such as back pain, unknown problem, and traumatic injury had sensitivities for ALS interventions<15%.
The MPDS is moderately sensitive for the Delphi process derived ALS, ALS-Stat, and ALS-Critical intervention levels, but nonspecific. A low MPDS priority is predictive of no prehospital intervention. A high priority, however, is of little predictive value for ALS, ALS-Stat, or ALS-Critical interventions.
医疗优先调度系统(MPDS)是一种广泛用于优先处理 9-1-1 电话并优化资源分配的紧急医疗调度系统。本研究评估了分配的优先级是否可预测每个紧急医疗调度类别中的德尔福过程衍生的院前干预水平。
从 2004 年至 2006 年,加利福尼亚州郊区的每位接受 MPDS 优先级的患者均被纳入研究。另一个系统的急救医疗服务(EMS)专业人员进行了德尔福过程,制定了以下代表逐渐增加的严重程度的院前治疗类别,这些类别已适应本研究:高级生命支持(ALS)干预、ALS-Stat 和 ALS-Critical。对于每个 MPDS 类别,确定了 MPDS 优先级对院前干预水平的敏感性和特异性。还为每个 MPDS 类别计算了低优先级和高优先级调度代码的低优先级和高优先级调度代码的可能性比。
共有 65268 名患者符合纳入标准,占研究期间 EMS 呼叫的 61%。高优先级调度代码对 ALS、ALS-Stat 和 ALS-Critical 干预的总体敏感性分别为 83%(95%置信区间 83-84%)、83%(82-84%)和 94%(92-96%)。总体特异性为:ALS,32%(31-32%);ALS-Stat,31%(30-31%);ALS-Critical 为 28%(28-29%)。与低优先级调度代码相比,具有高优先级调度代码的调度代码更有可能接受 ALS 干预,增加 22%,ALS-Stat 增加 20%,ALS-Critical 增加 32%。低优先级调度代码使 ALS 干预的可能性降低了 48%,ALS-Stat 降低了 45%,ALS-Critical 降低了 80%。在高优先级调度代码中,干预率为:ALS 为 26%,ALS-Stat 为 22%,ALS-Critical 为 1.5%,均显著高于低优先级呼叫(p<0.05)[ALS 为 13%,ALS-Stat 为 11%,ALS-Critical 为 0.2%]。具有高灵敏度(>95%)用于 ALS 干预的主要 MPDS 类别包括呼吸问题,心脏或呼吸骤停/死亡,胸痛,中风和无意识/晕厥;这些类别平均特异性为 3%。腰痛,未知问题和创伤性损伤等 MPDS 类别对 ALS 干预的敏感性<15%。
MPDS 对德尔福过程衍生的 ALS、ALS-Stat 和 ALS-Critical 干预水平具有中等敏感性,但特异性不强。低 MPDS 优先级表示无院前干预。但是,高优先级对于 ALS、ALS-Stat 或 ALS-Critical 干预几乎没有预测价值。