Suppr超能文献

[两种定性细菌学尿液分析方法的比较]

[Comparison of 2 methods of qualitative bacteriological urinalysis].

作者信息

Meisel-Mikołajczyk F, Rafałowska K

机构信息

Pracowni Diagnostycznej Zakładu Bakteriologii i Immunologii Instytutu Biostruktury AM w Warszawie.

出版信息

Pol Tyg Lek. 1990;45(36-37):762-3.

PMID:2084634
Abstract

Two techniques of the quantitative bacteriological urinalysis were compared. Hundred seventy eight samples of the urine were analysed with routine technique and paper strip test "Mast Bacteriuritest". Hundred percent conformity of both techniques was obtained in case of insignificant bacteriuria. In case of significant bacteriuria the results differed: paper tests were negative in 10% of cases. Significant bacteriuria was diagnosed in the samples in which Gould's test was positive with routine technique in 22% and with paper test in 18% of the analysed samples. It seems that paper test is valuable quantitative technique of the urinalysis because of its simplicity and low cost. It should be used, however, for the detection of the significant bacteriuria.

摘要

对定量细菌学尿液分析的两种技术进行了比较。采用常规技术和“Mast细菌尿检测试纸”对178份尿液样本进行了分析。在菌尿不显著的情况下,两种技术的符合率为100%。在菌尿显著的情况下,结果有所不同:试纸检测在10%的病例中呈阴性。在分析的样本中,采用常规技术时,古尔德试验呈阳性的样本中有22%被诊断为菌尿显著,采用试纸检测时这一比例为18%。由于试纸检测简单且成本低,似乎它是一种有价值的尿液分析定量技术。然而,它应用于检测菌尿显著的情况。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验