• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

OSHA 检查能预防哪些类型的伤害?

What kinds of injuries do OSHA inspections prevent?

机构信息

RAND Corporation, 4570 Fifth Avenue, Suite 600, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.

出版信息

J Safety Res. 2010 Aug;41(4):339-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2010.03.005. Epub 2010 Jun 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.jsr.2010.03.005
PMID:20846550
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

OSHA's enforcement program is one of the major public efforts to protect American workers. We examine both the scope of injury prevention that inspections can contribute and the types of standards that contribute the most.

METHODS

We linked Pennsylvania Department of Labor and Industry files for lost-time injuries and employment to calculate injury rates for 1998-2005 for all single-establishment manufacturing firms. We linked these to OSHA inspection records.

RESULTS

Inspections with penalties did affect injury types unrelated to standards as well as those related. We also found again that citations for violations of the standard requiring personal protective equipment had the largest impact on preventing injuries.

IMPACT ON INDUSTRY

Programs requiring protective equipment use deserve added attention from consultants and inspectors. In addition, some inspections spur managers to undertake safety measures that go beyond compliance with standards.

摘要

目的

职业安全与健康管理局的执法计划是保护美国工人的主要公众努力之一。我们考察了检查可以促进的伤害预防范围以及贡献最大的标准类型。

方法

我们将宾夕法尼亚州劳工和工业部的损失工时伤害和就业记录进行了链接,以计算 1998 年至 2005 年所有单一机构制造业公司的伤害率。我们将这些记录与 OSHA 检查记录进行了链接。

结果

有处罚的检查不仅影响了与标准无关的伤害类型,也影响了相关的伤害类型。我们再次发现,对要求使用个人防护设备的标准违规行为的传票对预防伤害的影响最大。

对行业的影响

需要使用防护设备的计划值得顾问和检查员的额外关注。此外,一些检查促使管理人员采取超出标准合规性的安全措施。

相似文献

1
What kinds of injuries do OSHA inspections prevent?OSHA 检查能预防哪些类型的伤害?
J Safety Res. 2010 Aug;41(4):339-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2010.03.005. Epub 2010 Jun 22.
2
A new estimate of the impact of OSHA inspections on manufacturing injury rates, 1998-2005.OSHA 检查对制造业伤害率影响的新估计,1998-2005 年。
Am J Ind Med. 2012 Nov;55(11):964-75. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22062. Epub 2012 May 7.
3
Work-related amputations in Michigan, 1997.1997年密歇根州与工作相关的截肢情况。
Am J Ind Med. 2003 Oct;44(4):359-67. doi: 10.1002/ajim.10282.
4
Injury and illness in the American workplace: a comparison of data sources.美国工作场所的工伤与疾病:数据来源比较
Am J Ind Med. 1996 Aug;30(2):130-41. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199608)30:2<130::AID-AJIM3>3.0.CO;2-4.
5
The cost of treating injured workers: the changing workers' compensation landscape.治疗受伤工人的成本:不断变化的工伤赔偿格局。
Benefits Q. 1993;9(4):9-21.
6
Local government workers' health and safety programs.地方政府工作人员的健康与安全计划。
Occup Med. 2001 Jan-Mar;16(1):79-99.
7
Differential treatment of occupational disease v occupational injury by workers' compensation in Washington State.华盛顿州工人赔偿制度对职业病与职业伤害的差别对待。
J Occup Med. 1991 Feb;33(2):121-6.
8
Occupational amputations in Illinois 2000-2007: BLS vs. data linkage of trauma registry, hospital discharge, workers compensation databases and OSHA citations.2000-2007 年伊利诺伊州的职业性截肢:BLS 与创伤登记处、医院出院记录、工人赔偿数据库和 OSHA 引文的数据链接比较。
Injury. 2013 May;44(5):667-73. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.01.007. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
9
Prioritizing prevention opportunities in the Washington State construction industry, 2003-2007.优先考虑华盛顿州建筑行业的预防机会,2003-2007 年。
J Safety Res. 2010 Jun;41(3):197-202. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2010.02.010. Epub 2010 Apr 14.
10
Barriers to documenting occupational injuries among personal assistance services workers.个人护理服务工作者职业伤害记录的障碍。
Am J Ind Med. 2007 Jul;50(7):536-44. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20473.

引用本文的文献

1
Occupational health and safety regulatory interventions to improve the work environment: An evidence and gap map of effectiveness studies.改善工作环境的职业健康与安全监管干预措施:有效性研究的证据与差距图谱
Campbell Syst Rev. 2023 Dec 11;19(4):e1371. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1371. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
The Impact of Enforcement Capabilities on the Effectiveness of Public Assessment on Occupational Safety.执法能力对职业安全公共评估有效性的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 3;17(17):6426. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176426.
3
Metrics to assess injury prevention programs for young workers in high-risk occupations: a scoping review of the literature.
评估高风险职业年轻工人伤害预防计划的指标:文献综述
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2018 May;38(5):191-199. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.38.5.01.
4
Safety activities in small businesses.小企业中的安全活动。
Saf Sci. 2014 Apr;64:32-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.11.022.
5
Occupational safety and health enforcement tools for preventing occupational diseases and injuries.预防职业病和工伤的职业安全与健康执法工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Aug 30;2013(8):CD010183. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010183.pub2.