Occupational Risk Prevention, Avenida Antonio Pascual Acosta, n° 1, 23009 Jaén, Spain.
School of Industrial Engineering, Camino de los Descubrimientos sn, Universidad de Sevilla, 41092 Sevilla, Spain.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 3;17(17):6426. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176426.
(1) Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of enforcement capabilities on the efficacy of two public interventions to improve occupational safety in olive mills. (2) Method: The difference in efficacy was evaluated by comparing the risks detected in two groups in an initial assessment (with visits in the 2006-2008 period) to the risks detected in a later assessment, either after an intervention by Authorized Technicians with enforcement capabilities or after an intervention by Technical Advisors without enforcement capabilities (2011-2013). The assessments identified risks in the companies, according to a specific risk map for olive oil mill enterprises. (3) Results: Statistically significant differences were observed in the comparison of the risk reductions of the two groups, with regard to the initial assessment. The greatest reductions in risk were found in the companies that received interventions by Authorized Technicians with enforcement capabilities, in the sections of individual protection equipment and the storage of dangerous products. (4) Conclusion: Interventions by Authorized Technicians with enforcement capabilities are more effective than interventions by Technical Advisors without enforcement capabilities.
(1) 目的：本研究旨在评估执法能力对两种提高橄榄磨坊职业安全的公共干预措施效果的影响。(2) 方法：通过比较两组在初始评估（2006-2008 年期间进行访问）中发现的风险与后续评估（在具有执法能力的授权技术人员进行干预后，或在没有执法能力的技术顾问进行干预后（2011-2013 年）发现的风险，评估确定了公司存在的风险，根据橄榄油厂企业特定的风险图。(3) 结果：在比较两组的风险降低时，观察到了统计学上的显著差异，初始评估。在个体防护设备和危险产品储存等方面，接受授权技术人员执法干预的公司的风险降低幅度最大。(4) 结论：具有执法能力的授权技术人员的干预措施比没有执法能力的技术顾问的干预措施更有效。
