Wilson Nicole A, Mazahery B Tom, Koh Jason L, Zhang Li-Qun
Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47(6):531-41. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2009.12.0204.
Decreases in patellofemoral pain have been demonstrated with bracing; however, the mechanisms of pain reduction remain unclear. Our purpose was to evaluate the hypothesis that patellofemoral bracing decreases peak pressure on the retropatellar surface through an increase in patellofemoral contact area. Nine cadaveric knees were tested during simulated free-speed walking with no brace, a knee sleeve, two different patellar stabilization sleeves, and a wrap-style patellar stabilization brace. Contact area and pressure were measured using a dynamic pressure sensor located in the patellofemoral joint. For the unbraced knee, contact area and peak pressure varied with knee flexion angle, ranging from 0.30 ± 0.3 cm(2) and 1.80 ± 1.7 MPa at full extension to 2.28 ± 0.5 cm(2) and 4.19 ± 1.7 MPa at peak knee flexion. All braces increased contact area, while the wrap-style brace decreased peak pressure (p < 0.001). Sleeve braces compress the quadriceps tendon causing the patella to engage the trochlear groove earlier during knee flexion. The wrap-style brace reduced peak pressure by shifting the location of highest pressure to a region with increased articular cartilage thickness. Sleeve braces may be useful for treatment of patellar subluxation disorders, while wrap-style braces may be effective for treatment of disorders associated with degenerative cartilage changes.
使用支具已证明可减轻髌股关节疼痛;然而,疼痛减轻的机制仍不清楚。我们的目的是评估以下假设:髌股关节支具通过增加髌股关节接触面积来降低髌后表面的峰值压力。在模拟自由速度行走过程中,对九个尸体膝关节进行测试,测试时分别不使用支具、使用护膝、使用两种不同的髌骨稳定护膝以及使用包裹式髌骨稳定支具。使用位于髌股关节的动态压力传感器测量接触面积和压力。对于未使用支具的膝关节,接触面积和峰值压力随膝关节屈曲角度而变化,从完全伸展时的0.30±0.3平方厘米和1.80±1.7兆帕到膝关节屈曲峰值时的2.28±0.5平方厘米和4.19±1.7兆帕。所有支具均增加了接触面积,而包裹式支具降低了峰值压力(p<0.001)。套筒式支具挤压股四头肌腱,导致髌骨在膝关节屈曲过程中更早地进入滑车沟。包裹式支具通过将最高压力的位置转移到关节软骨厚度增加的区域来降低峰值压力。套筒式支具可能有助于治疗髌骨半脱位疾病,而包裹式支具可能对治疗与退行性软骨变化相关的疾病有效。