Centre for Vision Research, York University, Toronto, Canada.
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Nov;48(13):3725-32. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.09.008. Epub 2010 Sep 17.
Anecdotally, it has been reported that individuals with acquired prosopagnosia compensate for their inability to recognize faces by using other person identity cues such as hair, gait or the voice. Are they therefore superior at the use of non-face cues, specifically voices, to person identity? Here, we empirically measure person and object identity recognition in a patient with acquired prosopagnosia and object agnosia. We quantify person identity (face and voice) and object identity (car and horn) recognition for visual, auditory, and bimodal (visual and auditory) stimuli. The patient is unable to recognize faces or cars, consistent with his prosopagnosia and object agnosia, respectively. He is perfectly able to recognize people's voices and car horns and bimodal stimuli. These data show a reverse shift in the typical weighting of visual over auditory information for audiovisual stimuli in a compromised visual recognition system. Moreover, the patient shows selectively superior voice recognition compared to the controls revealing that two different stimulus domains, persons and objects, may not be equally affected by sensory adaptation effects. This also implies that person and object identity recognition are processed in separate pathways. These data demonstrate that an individual with acquired prosopagnosia and object agnosia can compensate for the visual impairment and become quite skilled at using spared aspects of sensory processing. In the case of acquired prosopagnosia it is advantageous to develop a superior use of voices for person identity recognition in everyday life.
据报道,一些后天性面孔失认症患者通过使用其他身份线索,如发型、步态或声音来弥补其无法识别面孔的能力。那么,他们是否更擅长使用非面孔线索,特别是声音来识别身份?在这里,我们通过对一名后天性面孔失认症和物体失认症患者进行实证研究,来测量其对人和物体身份的识别能力。我们定量分析了患者对视觉、听觉和视听(视觉和听觉)刺激的身份识别,包括对人和物体的身份识别(面孔和声音,汽车和喇叭)。该患者无法识别面孔或汽车,这分别与他的面孔失认症和物体失认症相一致。他能够完美地识别出人们的声音和汽车喇叭以及视听刺激。这些数据显示,在一个受损的视觉识别系统中,对于视听刺激,视觉信息相对于听觉信息的典型权重发生了反转。此外,与对照组相比,患者表现出对声音的选择性识别优势,这表明两个不同的刺激领域,人和物体,可能不会受到相同的感觉适应效应的影响。这也意味着人和物体的身份识别是在不同的路径中进行处理的。这些数据表明,患有后天性面孔失认症和物体失认症的个体可以弥补视觉障碍,并在使用感官处理方面变得非常熟练。在后天性面孔失认症的情况下,发展出一种更擅长使用声音来识别身份的能力在日常生活中是有利的。