Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA Department of Division of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA Department of Diagnostic and Biological Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA NeurogesX, Inc., San Mateo, CA 94404, USA.
Pain. 2010 Dec;151(3):575-581. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.06.034. Epub 2010 Sep 20.
Quantitative sensory testing (QST) is commonly used to evaluate peripheral sensory function in neuropathic conditions. QST measures vary in repeated measurements of normal subjects but it is not known whether QST can reflect small changes in epidermal nerve fiber density (ENFd). This study evaluated QST measures (touch, mechanical pain, heat pain and innocuous cold sensations) for differences between genders and over time using ENFd as an objective-independent measure. QST was performed on the thighs of 36 healthy volunteers on four occasions between December and May. ENFd in skin biopsies was determined on three of those visits. Compared to men, women had a higher ENFd, a difference of 12.2 ENFs/mm. They also had lower tactile and innocuous cold thresholds, and detected mechanical pain (pinprick) at a higher frequency. Heat pain thresholds did not differ between genders. By the end of the 24-week study, men and women showed a small reduction (p<0.05) in the frequency of sharp mechanical pain evoked by pinprick whereas tactile and thermal thresholds showed no change. This coincided with a small decrease in ENFd, 4.18 ENFs/mm. Variation in measurements over time was large in a fraction of normal subjects. We conclude that most QST measures detect relatively large differences in epidermal innervation (12.2 ENFs/mm), but response to mechanical pain was the only sensory modality tested with the sensitivity to detect small changes in innervation (4.18 ENFs/mm). Since some individuals had large unsystematic variations, unexpected test results should therefore alert clinicians to test additional locations.
定量感觉测试(QST)常用于评估神经病变中的周围感觉功能。QST 测量值在正常受试者的重复测量中存在差异,但尚不清楚 QST 是否可以反映表皮神经纤维密度(ENFd)的微小变化。本研究使用 ENFd 作为客观独立的测量指标,评估了 QST 测量值(触觉、机械痛觉、热痛觉和无害冷觉)在性别和时间上的差异。36 名健康志愿者的大腿在 12 月至 5 月期间进行了 4 次 QST。其中 3 次访问时还测定了皮肤活检中的 ENFd。与男性相比,女性的 ENFd 更高,差异为 12.2 ENFs/mm。她们的触觉和无害冷觉阈值也较低,机械痛觉(刺痛)的检测频率更高。性别之间的热痛觉阈值没有差异。在 24 周的研究结束时,男性和女性的刺痛诱发尖锐机械痛觉的频率都略有下降(p<0.05),而触觉和热阈值没有变化。这与 ENFd 的小幅下降(4.18 ENFs/mm)相吻合。在一部分正常受试者中,测量值随时间的变化很大。我们得出结论,大多数 QST 测量值都能检测到表皮神经支配的相对较大差异(12.2 ENFs/mm),但机械痛觉的反应是唯一一种测试的感觉模式,具有检测神经支配微小变化的敏感性(4.18 ENFs/mm)。由于一些个体的变化很大,因此意外的测试结果应该提醒临床医生测试其他部位。