• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学龄前儿童上臂中部周长评估:NCHS/CDC-2000 与 WHO-2006 标准的比较。

Evaluation of mid-upper arm circumference in pre-school children: comparison between NCHS/CDC-2000 and WHO-2006 references.

机构信息

Departamento de Saúde Materno-Infantil, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

J Trop Pediatr. 2011 Jun;57(3):208-12. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmq076. Epub 2010 Sep 17.

DOI:10.1093/tropej/fmq076
PMID:20852256
Abstract

We aimed to evaluate the classification of arm circumference (AC) in pre-school children by using National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS/CDC-2000) and World Health Organization (WHO-2006) references. We evaluated 205 children: weight, height and AC were assessed and the body mass index (BMI) was calculated. The BMI values were classified into Z-scores by the WHO referential. The AC was classified into Z-cores by two references, comparing the whole-sample value and among groups (tercis) of BMI Z-score. The correlation was also evaluated between differences of AC with BMI Z-score. The WHO referential classified the AC in Z-scores greater than the NCHS/CDC, which is more specific and less sensitive than the NCHS/CDC for lean children and at the same time more sensitive and less specific for children with overweight. In conclusion, a significant difference in the AC classification occurs according to the referential used.

摘要

我们旨在使用国家健康统计中心(NCHS/CDC-2000)和世界卫生组织(WHO-2006)的参考标准来评估学龄前儿童的臂围(AC)分类。我们评估了 205 名儿童:评估了体重、身高和 AC,并计算了体重指数(BMI)。根据世卫组织参考标准,将 BMI 值分类为 Z 分数。通过两种参考标准,将 AC 分类为 Z 分数,比较了整个样本值和 BMI Z 分数的 tertis(三分位)组。还评估了 AC 与 BMI Z 分数差异之间的相关性。与 NCHS/CDC 相比,WHO 参考标准将 AC 分类为 Z 分数更高,对于瘦弱儿童,该标准比 NCHS/CDC 更具体但灵敏度更低,而对于超重儿童,该标准则更敏感但特异性更低。总之,根据使用的参考标准,AC 的分类会出现显著差异。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of mid-upper arm circumference in pre-school children: comparison between NCHS/CDC-2000 and WHO-2006 references.学龄前儿童上臂中部周长评估:NCHS/CDC-2000 与 WHO-2006 标准的比较。
J Trop Pediatr. 2011 Jun;57(3):208-12. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmq076. Epub 2010 Sep 17.
2
Comparison of NCHS, CDC and WHO growth charts in the nutritional assessment of hospitalized children up to five years old.美国国家卫生统计中心(NCHS)、美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)和世界卫生组织(WHO)生长曲线图在五岁以下住院儿童营养评估中的比较
Nutr Hosp. 2011 May-Jun;26(3):465-71. doi: 10.1590/S0212-16112011000300006.
3
Field testing of the 2006 World Health Organization growth charts from birth to 2 years: assessment of hospital undernutrition and overnutrition rates and the usefulness of BMI.2006年世界卫生组织出生至2岁生长曲线的现场测试:医院营养不良和营养过剩率评估及身体质量指数的实用性
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2008 Mar-Apr;32(2):145-53. doi: 10.1177/0148607108314386.
4
Comparison of the new World Health Organization growth standards and the National Center for Health Statistics growth reference regarding mortality of malnourished children treated in a 2006 nutrition program in Niger.2006年尼日尔营养项目中接受治疗的营养不良儿童死亡率方面,世界卫生组织新生长标准与美国国家卫生统计中心生长参考标准的比较。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009 Feb;163(2):126-30. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2008.540.
5
Comparison of NCHS, CDC, and WHO curves in children with cardiovascular risk.患有心血管疾病风险儿童的美国国家卫生统计中心(NCHS)、美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)及世界卫生组织(WHO)曲线比较
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2013 Jul-Aug;59(4):375-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ramb.2013.02.001. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
6
Using the new World Health Organisation growth standards: differences from 3 countries.采用世界卫生组织新的生长标准:三个国家的差异
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2008 Mar;46(3):316-21. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e31815d6968.
7
Comparison of the prevalence of shortness, underweight, and overweight among US children aged 0 to 59 months by using the CDC 2000 and the WHO 2006 growth charts.使用美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)2000年生长图表和世界卫生组织(WHO)2006年生长图表对美国0至59个月儿童的矮小、体重不足和超重患病率进行比较。
J Pediatr. 2008 Nov;153(5):622-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.05.048. Epub 2008 Jul 10.
8
Growth patterns of Qatari school children and adolescents aged 6-18 years.卡塔尔6至18岁学童及青少年的生长模式。
J Health Popul Nutr. 2005 Sep;23(3):250-8.
9
The Andalusian Nutritional Survey: comparison of the nutritional status of Andalusian children aged 6-60 months with that of the NCHS/CDC reference population.安达卢西亚营养调查:6至60个月大的安达卢西亚儿童与美国国家卫生统计中心/疾病控制与预防中心参考人群营养状况的比较。
Bull World Health Organ. 1989;67(4):409-16.
10
A mathematical approach for estimating reference values for weight-for-age, weight-for-height and height-for-age.一种估算年龄别体重、身高别体重和年龄别身高参考值的数学方法。
Growth Dev Aging. 1997 Spring;61(1):3-10.

引用本文的文献

1
Anthropometric characteristics of children living in food-insecure households in the USA.美国食物无保障家庭儿童的人体测量特征。
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Oct;24(15):4803-4811. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021002378. Epub 2021 May 28.
2
Construct validity of a figure rating scale for Brazilian adolescents.巴西青少年体态评分量表的结构效度。
Nutr J. 2012 Apr 13;11:24. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-11-24.
3
Hydatidiform mole resulting from sexual violence.性暴力导致的葡萄胎
Int Arch Med. 2012 Feb 21;5:8. doi: 10.1186/1755-7682-5-8.
4
Nutritional status of pre-school children from low income families.低收入家庭学龄前儿童的营养状况。
Nutr J. 2011 May 8;10:43. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-10-43.