• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国国家卫生统计中心(NCHS)、美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)和世界卫生组织(WHO)生长曲线图在五岁以下住院儿童营养评估中的比较

Comparison of NCHS, CDC and WHO growth charts in the nutritional assessment of hospitalized children up to five years old.

作者信息

Silveira C R M, Beghetto M G, Carvalho P R A, Mello E D

机构信息

Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil.

出版信息

Nutr Hosp. 2011 May-Jun;26(3):465-71. doi: 10.1590/S0212-16112011000300006.

DOI:10.1590/S0212-16112011000300006
PMID:21892562
Abstract

AIMS

This study evaluated the agreement of growth charts proposed by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS/1977), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC/2000) and World Health Organization (WHO/2006).

METHODS

Were assessed children between 0 and 5 years old, hospitalized in the pediatric wards of a Brazilian school hospital. Z-score indexes: stature/age (S/A), weight/age (W/A) and weight/stature (W/S) was evaluated, in each of the three references (NCHS, CDC and WHO). ANOVA and test Bland & Altman and Lin plots were used in the comparison of the 3 charts. The agreement of the nutritional state categories was also evaluated, through kappa coefficient. The study was approved by the Institution's Research Ethics Committee.

RESULTS

The study analyzed 337 children, whose median age was 0.52 (IQR: 0.21-1.65) years, 65.3% of them were below 1 year old, 60.2% were male and 50% hospitalized due to acute respiratory disease. Lower Z-scores of W/A and S/A were obtained with the WHO charts and lower W/S with the CDC chart. High correlation and agreement were observed among the criteria, but more patients were classified as presenting shortness through the WHO criteria. CDC and WHO criteria were more rigorous than the NCHS criteria for the diagnosis of underweight (W/A) and malnutrition (W/S).

CONCLUSION

Despite the strong agreement of the 3 charts, the adoption of the WHO charts seems to be more helpful for the children's nutritional screening for admission, as it enables to detect a higher number of malnourished children or at nutritional risk, who will benefit from an early intervention.

摘要

目的

本研究评估了美国国家卫生统计中心(NCHS/1977)、疾病控制与预防中心(CDC/2000)和世界卫生组织(WHO/2006)提出的生长图表的一致性。

方法

对一家巴西教学医院儿科病房收治的0至5岁儿童进行评估。在三个参考标准(NCHS、CDC和WHO)中,分别评估身高/年龄(S/A)、体重/年龄(W/A)和体重/身高(W/S)的Z评分指数。使用方差分析、布兰德-奥特曼检验和林氏图对这三个图表进行比较。还通过kappa系数评估营养状况分类的一致性。该研究获得了机构研究伦理委员会的批准。

结果

该研究分析了337名儿童,他们的中位年龄为0.52(四分位间距:0.21 - 1.65)岁,其中65.3%年龄小于1岁,60.2%为男性,50%因急性呼吸道疾病住院。WHO图表得出的W/A和S/A的Z评分较低,而CDC图表得出的W/S较低。各标准之间观察到高度相关性和一致性,但通过WHO标准被归类为身材矮小的患者更多。在诊断体重不足(W/A)和营养不良(W/S)方面,CDC和WHO标准比NCHS标准更严格。

结论

尽管这三个图表具有很强的一致性,但采用WHO图表似乎对儿童入院时的营养筛查更有帮助,因为它能够检测出更多营养不良或有营养风险的儿童,这些儿童将受益于早期干预。

相似文献

1
Comparison of NCHS, CDC and WHO growth charts in the nutritional assessment of hospitalized children up to five years old.美国国家卫生统计中心(NCHS)、美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)和世界卫生组织(WHO)生长曲线图在五岁以下住院儿童营养评估中的比较
Nutr Hosp. 2011 May-Jun;26(3):465-71. doi: 10.1590/S0212-16112011000300006.
2
Evolution of nutritional status of pediatric in patients of a tertiary care general hospital in Brazil.巴西一家三级综合医院儿科住院患者营养状况的演变
Nutr Hosp. 2008 Nov-Dec;23(6):599-606.
3
Field testing of the 2006 World Health Organization growth charts from birth to 2 years: assessment of hospital undernutrition and overnutrition rates and the usefulness of BMI.2006年世界卫生组织出生至2岁生长曲线的现场测试:医院营养不良和营养过剩率评估及身体质量指数的实用性
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2008 Mar-Apr;32(2):145-53. doi: 10.1177/0148607108314386.
4
Comparison of the prevalence of shortness, underweight, and overweight among US children aged 0 to 59 months by using the CDC 2000 and the WHO 2006 growth charts.使用美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)2000年生长图表和世界卫生组织(WHO)2006年生长图表对美国0至59个月儿童的矮小、体重不足和超重患病率进行比较。
J Pediatr. 2008 Nov;153(5):622-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.05.048. Epub 2008 Jul 10.
5
Evaluation of mid-upper arm circumference in pre-school children: comparison between NCHS/CDC-2000 and WHO-2006 references.学龄前儿童上臂中部周长评估:NCHS/CDC-2000 与 WHO-2006 标准的比较。
J Trop Pediatr. 2011 Jun;57(3):208-12. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmq076. Epub 2010 Sep 17.
6
Health of children classified as underweight by CDC reference but normal by WHO standard.儿童健康状况:被美国疾病预防控制中心参照标准归类为体重不足,但符合世界卫生组织标准。
Pediatrics. 2013 Jun;131(6):e1780-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-2382. Epub 2013 May 20.
7
Growth assessment in infants and toddlers using three different reference charts.使用三种不同参考图表对婴幼儿进行生长评估。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2005 Mar;40(3):283-8. doi: 10.1097/01.mpg.0000155183.54001.01.
8
WHO 2006 child growth standards: implications for the prevalence of stunting and underweight-for-age in a birth cohort of Gabonese children in comparison to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2000 growth charts and the National Center for Health Statistics 1978 growth references.世界卫生组织2006年儿童生长标准:与疾病控制和预防中心2000年生长图表以及国家卫生统计中心1978年生长参考标准相比,对加蓬儿童出生队列中发育迟缓及年龄别体重不足患病率的影响。
Public Health Nutr. 2008 Jul;11(7):714-9. doi: 10.1017/S1368980007001449. Epub 2008 Jan 2.
9
Comparison of changes in growth percentiles of US children on CDC 2000 growth charts with corresponding changes on WHO 2006 growth charts.美国儿童在疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)2000年生长图表上生长百分位数的变化与在世界卫生组织(WHO)2006年生长图表上相应变化的比较。
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2011 May;50(5):402-7. doi: 10.1177/0009922810392774. Epub 2011 Jan 17.
10
Using the new World Health Organisation growth standards: differences from 3 countries.采用世界卫生组织新的生长标准:三个国家的差异
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2008 Mar;46(3):316-21. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e31815d6968.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of body mass index on soft tissues in adolescents with skeletal class I and normal facial height.体重指数对骨骼 I 类、面部高度正常的青少年软组织的影响。
PeerJ. 2023 Oct 3;11:e16196. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16196. eCollection 2023.
2
Accuracy of international growth charts to assess nutritional status in children and adolescents: a systematic review.国际生长图表评估儿童和青少年营养状况的准确性:系统评价。
Rev Paul Pediatr. 2022 Apr 4;40:e2021016. doi: 10.1590/1984-0462/2022/40/2021016. eCollection 2022.
3
Relation between changes in weight parameters and height parameters in prepubertal children: daily weight gain and BMIi changes in relation to linear growth during nutritional rehabilitation of underweight children.
青春期前儿童体重参数与身高参数变化之间的关系:体重不足儿童营养康复期间每日体重增加及体质指数标准差评分变化与线性生长的关系
Acta Biomed. 2019 Sep 23;90(8-S):7-19. doi: 10.23750/abm.v90i8-S.8516.
4
Comparison of Nutrition Status as Assessed by Revised IAP 2015 Growth Charts and CDC 2000 Growth Charts in Lower Socioeconomic Class School Children.修订版 IAP 2015 生长图表与 CDC 2000 生长图表评估下社会经济阶层学校儿童营养状况的比较。
Indian J Pediatr. 2019 Dec;86(12):1136-1138. doi: 10.1007/s12098-019-03036-w. Epub 2019 Jul 29.