Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, The People's Republic of China.
J Glaucoma. 2011 Aug;20(6):344-9. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181efb388.
To evaluate if the ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) (the difference between systolic and diastolic intraocular pressure) is associated with the measurement variability of IOPg [Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure (IOP)], IOPcc (corneal compensated IOP), corneal hysteresis (CH), and corneal resistance factor (CRF) obtained from the ocular response analyzer (ORA).
Sixty normal participants and 60 glaucoma patients were included. In 1 randomly selected eye in each participant, 4 repeated measurements were obtained with the ORA (Reichert Inc, Depew, NY) followed by OPA measurement by dynamic contour tonometry (Pascal; Swiss Microtechnology AG, Port, Switzerland). The repeatability of IOPg (a mathematically derived value with strong correlation with Goldmann applanation pressure measurement), IOPcc (a mathematically derived measurement less affected by corneal biomechanical properties), CH, and CRF were calculated. The associations between age, refraction, keratometry, central corneal thickness, axial length, OPA, and ORA measurements variability were evaluated with univariate and multivariate regression analyses.
The repeatability of IOPg, IOPcc, CRF, and CH were 4.08 (95% confidence interval: 3.06-5.09) mm Hg, 4.72 (3.54-5.89) mm Hg, 2.14 (1.61-2.68) mm Hg, 2.35 (1.77-2.94) mm Hg, respectively, for the normal group; and 4.18 (3.75-4.61) mm Hg, 5.56 (4.99-6.14) mm Hg, 2.17 (1.95-2.40) mm Hg, 2.78 (2.50-3.07) mm Hg, respectively, for the glaucoma group. Within-subject variances of IOPg and IOPcc, but not CRF and CH, were positively correlated with OPA. No association was found between age, refraction, keratometry, central corneal thickness, axial length, and the measurement variability of ORA.
The measurement reliability of ORA was only moderate. Eyes with large OPA were associated with high IOP measurement variability. Taking average of multiple repeated measurements is important for reliable measurement of ORA.
评估眼脉冲幅度(OPA)(收缩压和舒张压之间的眼内压差异)是否与眼压(IOPg)[Goldmann 相关眼压(IOP)]、IOPcc(角膜补偿眼压)、角膜滞后(CH)和角膜阻力因子(CRF)的测量变异性相关,这些参数均由眼反应分析仪(ORA)获得。
纳入 60 名正常参与者和 60 名青光眼患者。在每位参与者的 1 只随机选择的眼中,使用 ORA(美国德莱柏公司,纽约州迪普伊)进行 4 次重复测量,随后使用动态轮廓眼压计(Pascal;瑞士微电子技术公司,瑞士波特)测量 OPA。计算IOPg(与 Goldmann 压平眼压测量具有强相关性的数学衍生值)、IOPcc(受角膜生物力学特性影响较小的数学衍生测量值)、CH 和 CRF 的重复性。使用单变量和多变量回归分析评估年龄、屈光度、角膜曲率计、中央角膜厚度、眼轴长度、OPA 和 ORA 测量值变异性之间的相关性。
正常组的 IOPg、IOPcc、CRF 和 CH 的重复性分别为 4.08(95%置信区间:3.06-5.09)mmHg、4.72(3.54-5.89)mmHg、2.14(1.61-2.68)mmHg、2.35(1.77-2.94)mmHg;青光眼组分别为 4.18(3.75-4.61)mmHg、5.56(4.99-6.14)mmHg、2.17(1.95-2.40)mmHg、2.78(2.50-3.07)mmHg。IOPg 和 IOPcc 的个体内方差与 OPA 呈正相关,但 CRF 和 CH 则不然。年龄、屈光度、角膜曲率计、中央角膜厚度、眼轴长度与 ORA 测量值的变异性之间无相关性。
ORA 的测量可靠性仅为中等。具有较大 OPA 的眼睛与较高的眼压测量变异性相关。对多次重复测量取平均值对于可靠测量 ORA 很重要。